Cloning the ca3080

Any suggestions before I start to clone the ca3080 in discretes? I have a legacy design I may need to make thousands of...

What I mean by suggestions is if any of the IC designers here could see any hidden process gotchas in the drawing in the datasheet. Ie emitter width, hidden structures, etc...

And yes, I know about the 13700 series...

Steve

Reply to
osr
Loading thread data ...

You'll have terrible thermal compensation ( = drifty offset and gain, plus thermal time constants) without monolithic construction. The representative circuit seems to be current mirrors and a diff amp, which will work fine. Doesn't seem to be anything remarkable about it, no bandgaps or Widlar-esque craziness.

Tim

--
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Tim Williams

We could make a copy ;-) ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson, CTO                            |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Jim Thompson

formatting link

Probably fakes, but maybe...they're good fakes? :)

Reply to
Bitrex

schreef in bericht news: snipped-for-privacy@z11g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...

Digi-Key lists the CA3080E from Intersil though they seem to have no stock.

Though the design seems pretty simple, building a thing like that in discretes may become a real nightmare.

If you really need thousends, ask Jim. He seems to have some experience with that kind of designs :)

petrus bitbyter

Reply to
petrus bitbyter

Wow, that was shortly after the era of nuvistors :-)

You might want to call these guys and ask how many they are holding:

formatting link

And these guys:

formatting link

Haven't dealt with either company lately and I don't know what the difference between the A, M, non-dash or other versions might be. Why does it absolutely have to be the CA3080?

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Joerg

I'm curious about the last point as well - as far as I know if one doesn't use the linearizing diodes and output buffer for all intents and purposes one half of an LM13700 is equivalent to a CA3080. According to:

formatting link
the LM13700 prototype was breadboarded with 3080s.

Reply to
Bitrex

It makes nice voltage controlled filters

Reply to
David Eather

Ok, it's a nifty chip, has bias control:

formatting link

But can't one do most things as well with a Gilbert multiplier or a gain-steerable video amp? If Steve wants to verbatim build another round of a yesteryear design then I could see the need. But to obtain thousands, that'll be slim pickings.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Joerg

Because "Its Yesterday Once More" . I'm going to need thousands of analog, sine wave VCOs, and 8038, 2206, and max38 are gone. Cost is a factor and microprocessors are unwelcome for this application.

So I looked at the analog synth stuff , and 3080 has bandwidth to spare...

Since this product may have to run for a decade, roll your own starts to look good... But at estimated 5K a year its hard to justify a foundry run.

Steve

Reply to
osr

Don't know what the pricing is, but these guys still make LM3080 and CA3080s:

formatting link
Altogether they have over 80K pieces.

Reply to
JW

I used 3080s in a tunable formant filter for analog speech synthesis about 30 years ago. It worked fine, but watch out for amplitude scaling. Without the linearization diodes (LM13700) the 3080 is truly a small-signal device, you'll start to pick up distortion with input differentials less than kT/q.

We did try to make an "improved" version using the linearized parts, but it sounded different and people didn't like it as much.

steveg

Reply to
Stephan Goldstein

The CA3080 had the problem that the transconductance varies from unit to unit too much.

You can make about as good of a variable gain by using a JFET to control the gain of an amplifier. If you get one designed for voltage controlled resistor service, you may be better off:

formatting link
See VCR11N

If you use a dual you can use a little feedback circuit on one to make the right gate voltage for the other and get the resistance control to be within about 20%.

Reply to
MooseFET

You're going to have a helluva time getting the device matching/tracking necessary.

What's the end use? Offline if you like. ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson, CTO                            |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Jim Thompson

Depends on how urgently it's needed in the marketplace and thus how much customers are willing to plunk down. At 5k/year a custom chip would cost serious two-digit, considering the amortization of IC design and masks over 4-5 years.

I don't know why uC are ruled out because that would be the way to go these days. Another option is to run an oscillator at a few hundred kHz or a MHz where you can use varicaps, and then mix that down to audio.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Joerg

I just did a Google search and Google suggested "CA3080 replacement".

It would seem others have a need to replace this part as well.

With over 10,000 hits, there may be close some replacement out there.

hamilton

Reply to
hamilton

That's SO extortionate! The CA3080 has five transistor pairs, no MOS or multilayer metallization, no resistors, only handles a milliamp of current... What lame designer or design center would have to 'amortize the IC design' over a period of years to handle this little item?

Aren't there semicustom routes, too?

Reply to
whit3rd

After prototyping, I replaced the linear design with a Atmel and told my boss just to buy a 10 year supply. Goal was no RF noise for a instrument app. I liked the linear, and the idea was to have to do as little redesign as possible during production.

Steve

Reply to
osr

How about using an LT1228 to do the same sort of function?

Reply to
MooseFET

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.