Chinese chip giant defies US pressure with 466 % debut surge

Like most RT stories, the article distorts reality. A frenzy of financial market speculation does not equate to technological success.

CXMT isn't going into the AI DRAM market. They're going after the low-end consumer and automotive DRAM markets, which are experiencing severe supply shortages driven by AI demand for DRAM manufacturing capacity. It has nothing to do with China suddenly acquiring expertise in advanced DRAM manufacturing, because they're not going there. The big players in the high-bandwidth memory HBM industry from Taiwan, S.Korea, and the U.S. overstated their capability, as indicated by total manufacturing attrition rates of between 40-60%. That's attrition, not yield.

|----------------------------------------------------------------------------| |"The restrictions were intended to limit China’s access to the tools needed"| |----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

I recall that the European Space Agency became founded because the United States of America decided to restrict European countries from accessings space. (S.

That's one way to put it, but not quite accurate. The U.S. refused to launch Euro commercial satellites that would compete with U.S. monopolies.

From the ESA itself:

While Europe and the U.S. routinely cooperated on scientific missions, the U.S. refused to launch European commercial satellites that could compete with American telecommunications monopolies. This restriction directly forced European nations to unite to build their own independent rocket program.

Thanks to someone for correctly reporting about ESA. (S.

Jan Panteltje snipped-for-privacy@comet.invalid spake the secret code <114c378$ke94$ snipped-for-privacy@dont-email.me thusly:

Another day, another RT-to-Jan copy/paste pipeline dumping Beijing financial fanfic into sci.electronics.design and pretending a stock-pop headline is an electronics discussion. Is Jan a CCP shill? Who knows; maybe he does this for free, which would be sadder. But when the pattern is Chinese rocket cheerleading, "bye bye Elon" garnish, America-decline sneering, and now a breathless recital of an IPO victory lap from RT, the difference between paid propaganda and volunteer pom-pom work becomes mostly tax accounting. If there is an actual design topic here, name it: DRAM cell structure, process node, yield, lithography limits, controller interface, retention, ECC behavior, power, timing, packaging, test, failure analysis, anything. Otherwise this is not sci.electronics.design; it is Jan standing in the aisle again, ringing his little red bell and yelling that the press release has defeated imperialism.

The constant America sneer has the unmistakable smell of small-pond envy dressed up as sophistication: the fellow peering over the fence, pretending his little bicycle path worldview is moral superiority, while millions of Americans can drive for hours on open highways, cross deserts, mountains, forests, and cities, and still not leave their home state. That kind of space drives certain cramped imaginations insane. So they convert envy into commentary, call it critique, and paste another Chinese press release as proof that the large, loud, impossible country they resent is finished this time for sure.

I think that this over-dramatises Jan. He's not representative of Dutch culture in any way, any more than John Larkin is representative of American culture. Like John, he's excessively influenced by the propaganda he runs into.

Somebody like

The Australian equivalent might be

JM snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com spake the secret code snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com thusly:

At least I can stay on topic instead of being a shill for CCP tofu dreg bullshit.

If you knew what you were talking about you'd also sound off about John Larkin's output, which is of a similar quality, but re-cycles right-wing, rather than left-wing bilge.

Why get fussed about feather-weights?