Book Signal Integrity for PCB Designs available on net

Hello friends , I came across a book for Signal Integrity which is available on internet. Check out

formatting link

The complete book will be made available over a period of two weeks.

Reply to
Additya
Loading thread data ...

From the above:

---

Tom - I was reading this rise time and knee frequency stuff. It says that the rise time is a significant thing and determines the highest frequency content. Does it mean that if I have a 1 KHz square wave that has a rise time of 100 ps, it should be treated as a high frequency signal with spectral frequency of or 3.5 GHz?

Bob - Ideally, yes, this 1 KHz signal should be treated as a 3.5 GHz signal at least from some of the SI angle, e.g., EMI. But Tom tell me why will anyone design a circuit with 1 KHz frequency with such a fast rise edge? Does it make sense? A very fast rising edge makes sense only when you want to achieve high data rate.

---

Seems like that needs a bit more qualification... more like, "while not too many applications require super-fast edges but have low repetition rates, sometimes this will occur..."

Reply to
Joel Koltner

3.5 GHz is the 3.5 millionth harmonic of 1 KHz. So the power spectral density up there will be zilch.

But a fast edge can ring at any frequency, and that could, for instance, mis-clock a flipflop. So just because a signal is 1 KHz doesn't mean it's "low frequency" and safe to use in a digital system.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

John Larkin a écrit :

content.

of

at

make

Let's push it a bit further...

350MHz is still 350Kth harmonic of 1kHz and there's still almost nothing there. So we can safely ignore this part of the spectrum...

... and, once provided the signal fundamental frequency is low enough we can design a rather band limited channel while still achieving fast rise time.

Cute!

--
Thanks,
Fred.
Reply to
Fred Bartoli

I think that's (sort of) what he's trying to say... it's just that there's plenty of application for fast pulse generators with lot repetition rates (e.g., TDR!), where you do need to treat the interconnects as "high speed."

Reply to
Joel Koltner

Even better. Since you have now determined that we no longer need the range from 350MHz to 3.5GHz we could auction that off and issue revenue anticipation bonds to plug some pressing holes in the budget. Since the money will have been spent by the time the auction happens we could already look at whether the 35kth harmonic is good enough so we can pay the interest :-)

--
SCNR, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply to
Joerg

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.