You pretty much have it, except the timing is a little different so that no overlap charge loses occur.
...Jim Thompson
You pretty much have it, except the timing is a little different so that no overlap charge loses occur.
...Jim Thompson
That's what I figured. Femtofarads and total liberty in device geometries , something us board level designers can't do. But we have to mind lurkers who see this and don't realize it was for a chip design where Id is under designer control.
Sequence of events:
Close SW2 Close SW3 Open SW3 Open SW2 Close SW1 Observe "OUT" Open SW1 | Repeat
...Jim Thompson
-- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at
True, all 'AC were not created equal--mine was a preproduction sample. Several parts burned themselves up. I notified the vendor--Fairchild, I think--and the production parts seemed better.
Too late though--I'd already designed in an 'HC part instead.
It was for a single-stage x7 frequency multiplier, the first such AFAIK, and it saved the company. I see Paul Burridge talking about the fine points in sed circa 2004, so I s'pose now it's common knowledge.
But back to yours, your 'AC00 is driven continuously with a pretty large signal. It doesn't spend much time being linear, so it wouldn't get as hot.
Cheers, James Arthur
Agreed. A proper comparator is the way to go. I recall I considered to use an HC14 as a comparator but after digging up some specs from different manufacturors it appeared the hysteresis isn't well defined.
Electronic parts are like people: it is very odd to find a typical (conforming to normal) one.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required