Anyone Use Qucs ?

Anyone have experience with it ? I got it on a sayso from someone and it is not bothering anything but, is it anything like Spice or LTSpice ? I see i t uses the file extension SCH instead of ASC, both of which were used by W indows. The SCH is for some kind of scheduler which I never use and never w ould anyway. If I don't know where I am I certainly not telling anyone else . :-)

And I have very little idea how to use LTSpice, but even less how to use Qu cs.

It is not big enough to bother getting rid of, but should I just throw the icon off my screen, or give it a try ?

Reply to
jurb6006
Loading thread data ...

Am 23.03.2018 um 22:42 schrieb snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com:

From what I have heard/seen, use QUCSstudio if you want to give it a try and not the 'old' qucs.

It has ghdl/vhdl, icarus verilog, kicad and octave integrated. qucs itself is a simulator that seems more universal than spice, including the usual stuff and also harmonic balance simulation, nonlinear noise and s-parameters. My personal impression is that this open source project urgently needs man power.

For a beginner, LTspice is probably the easier tool. There are more people you can ask.

<
formatting link
>

regards, Gerhard

Reply to
Gerhard Hoffmann

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.