snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:c38399dc-4da5-4cf4-94fb- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:
You are an idiot. There are thousands of counterfeit plastic toys here from china. Lego blocks are a big one.
That is just the counterfeits.
Wake the f*ck up, dumbfuck.
snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:c38399dc-4da5-4cf4-94fb- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:
So, you are so goddamned stupid that you do not watch the dily news either. How quaint.... not!
Just f*ck off, you know nothing, total piece of s*it.
snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:c38399dc-4da5-4cf4-94fb- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:
What are you, punk, eleven years old?
rote:
power
e accurate you have to add another qualifier or two.
evelopment of nuclear power. The issue is that it poses great risks from t he potential of accidents, but also from improper storage of nuclear waste, which no one has addressed. Of course this has all been discussed here be fore and I don't think anything new will come of it.
Yes. The radiation level spiked by a huge amount giving all three lethal d oses.
Counterfeit? Sure. But you claimed they were POISONOUS, which is a whole different thing. I just googled for "China counterfeit Lego toxic" and came back with lots of hits about counterfeit Legos, nothing about any of them being toxic. And the hits show that the govt is acting to seize the counterfeit product.
Wrong, always wrong.
And still making several separate replies to the same post.
Wrong, always wrong, even on that.
snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote in news:c826696a-4404-4f9c-a2ad- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:
You are a goddamned idiot.
snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:d2cc106b-925e-4adc-b318- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:
F*ck off and die, you retarded putz.
snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:d2cc106b-925e-4adc-b318- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:
F*ck off and die, you retarded putz.
You must sit up at night licking KRW's nuts.
snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:d2cc106b-925e-4adc-b318- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:
F*ck off and die, you retarded Usenet putz!
Not only can't you write but can't read what you write either, AlwaysWrong. The "totem pole" is the "lack of intelligence" totem pole, stupid.
A lot more than someone who is always wrong evidently, AlwaysWrong. That is; you're wrong again. No surprises here.
Dream on.
Still dreaming.
snipped-for-privacy@notreal.com wrote in news:7keqiehu9rcoopp22a8fde2lggea12ogau@
4ax.com:
Yet Another Retarded Usenet post by KRW.
Whodathunk... Oh that's right... everyone thinks you are f***ed in the head. Because you are.
You're always wrong, AlwaysWrong, so I'm alright.
Since krw clearly is cognitively challenged, his own opinion of his mental soundness is worthless, like pretty much everything else he posts.
He might have been okay before he stopped being able to absorb new information, but that was quite a while ago.
I have to say, your posts about these guys are getting as lame as their posts insulting and swearing at each other.
WTF?
Someone other than AlwaysWrong is reading whatever Slowman is writing?
Indeed!
LOL It is very funny indeed that I criticize someone by comparing them to you and you seem to thing that says more about them than it does about you.
Actually, old nuclear reactors are the safest form of energy production today. New technologies will just make them that much more safe.
The jury is still out on that assessment. Wait for 10,000 years until the waste has cooled enough to not be a threat. Until then, you really can't say how dangerous or safe nuclear power may be.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required