Conventional samplers for home brewers usually go to 1 GHz. The SD-32 sampler for the Tektronix 11801C mainframe goes to 50 GHz. The HP 110GHz oscilloscope costs around $1.3 Million USD, with a 10-bit resolution. Very impressive, and very expensive:
This technology is not pie-in-the-sky. I made a basic 5 GHz version for the University of Ludwigshafen, Germany, and they were very pleased with the results. This was the first prototype, and I have made significant improvements since then.
The sampler offers substantial advantages over conventional samplers:
- conventional diode samplers can have significant loss using multiple stages to acquire the sample, perhaps 40 dB or more. This degrades the SNR, especially for low-level signals. The new sampler has no such loss and operates on the input signal directly, giving maximum SNR.
- conventional samplers produce samples that combine the actual signal plus noise. Averaging can improve the SNR up to a limit, where it takes too long to improve the SNR. The improvement is given by sqrt(N), where N is the number of samples. Improving the SNR means doubling the number of samples, and eventually the doubling takes too long to be practical. In addition, the signal can drift during long sampling times making the results useless.
The new sampler bypasses this limit by restricting the amount of change that can occur in each sample, so the conventional equations no longer apply. It can easily recover signals buried in 30 dB of noise, which is impossible with conventional samplers.
I have two questions for the SED group:
- where would a sampler with this bandwidth and performance be useful?
- where can I find signal sources at these frequencies to check the response?
Thanks