Amazon Tackling Fake Product Reviews

Jun 23, 2015 8 Replies

Sleazy bottom feeder "businesses" have made the review process all but worthless. It's that same bunch of "content provider" riffraff.



formatting link


Yeah, the internet provides Fred an unlimited source of things to get mad about.

It tends to do that.

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc picosecond timing precision measurement jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com http://www.highlandtechnology.com

The ratings have always been all but worthless:

formatting link

On anything of significant value I read _all_ the reviews. Plus Amazon's return policy is superb. ...Jim Thompson

| James E.Thompson | mens | | Analog Innovations | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | San Tan Valley, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

It is as well to take some with a big pinch of salt.

Clueless morons can write reviews of books or kit too so you get examples where really good textbooks or kit has a *** rating consisting of a bimodal * (by idiots) and ***** (by experts) distribution.

The standard reference on JPEG has this problem:

formatting link

It is decidedly overpriced new, but who needs a mint edition?

More amusing so did this geologists hammer in 2012 (the clue is in the name for any dumber than a rock ice climbing survivalists out there).

formatting link

(examine the 1* reviews which dominated at one time)

Regards, Martin Brown

That can be several hundred. I read a sampling of the positive reviews and try to read all of the negative. Though there are often too many of them to read, too.

Which is why you actually have to READ the reviews. What _is_ it that's good/bad?

Great book. ...and I worked with Joan for a couple of years. ;-)

Your review is useless. ;-)

I wonder why they'd pan a JPEG book? ;-)

Sometimes fake reviews are not worthless, as in the case of the famous

55 gallon drum of KY Jelly. I hope they don't delete those. They're hilarious.

formatting link

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required