2.45GHz RFID reader

Nov 25, 2004 27 Replies

"Spehro Pefhany" schreef in bericht news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com...

Wo3 tong2 yi4!

Gai1 shui4 jiao4 le... ming tien jian!

Xie-xie ni, Frank. (remove 'x' and 'invalid' when replying by email)

Listen, pal, when you're through shooting your mouth off laughing inanely at nothing, like all morons do, learn to trim the f*cking F/U and save bandwidth.

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.

A little anyway.

Yes.

Thanks. Did I get it right?

formatting link

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com

nihao xiangyu,

ignore Paul Burridge - most people do.

Unfortunately a lot of people on this ng like to post drivel. There are a lot of very smart people who post gems though, so its worth sifting through crap.

Cheers Terry

LOL

ROTFLMAO!

I don't know - the situation changes continuously. Philips, for instance, has announced to have the UCODE 2.45GHz IC family in their portfolio of devices:

formatting link

but among the available products I can only find tag IC's

formatting link

which I intepret that either they don't have the reader ICs finished yet, or don't want to put them publicly available.

Another player in the market, Atmel, also seems to list the low-frequency RFID IC's only in their web page. Still, they have been working on higher-frequency devices for long-enough time to have them internally available:

formatting link
Karthaus & Fischer, IEEE J. Solid-State Circ., vol38 no10 p1602

Still another manufacturer, EM Microelectronic, again seems to list the EM4223 tag IC and no reader ICs.

Regards, Mikko

How successsful has your valiant stand been so far?

I used to have a cat that thought defending the road from traffic was a smart idea.

Cheers Terry

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required