10W amplifier, 2.2-2.4GHz

Anyone have an off-the-shelf 2.2-2.4GHz amplifier they like? ~10W is what I'm after. Mini-Circuits has their ZHL-30W-252+ which would be fine, although at $3k I'm continuing to do a bit of searching...

(And before anyone asks, no, I'm not building a high-power WiFi amplifier and, yes, I do have the appropriate FCC license to put this thing on the air -- with various restrictions on the exact frequencies and geographic locations, of course.)

---Joel

Reply to
Joel Koltner
Loading thread data ...

I found a pretty nice REMEC/Q-Bit model QBS-275 2400-2450MHz (+46dBm @ P1dB) amp made by QBit on e-bay. Similar amplifiers made by Toshiba in the 2.2 to 2.4 GHz range are available from an e-bay seller Pyrojoseph.

--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
"The RFI-EMI-GUY"©

"Treason doth never prosper: what\'s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."

"Follow The Money"  ;-P
Reply to
RFI-EMI-GUY

Linear or Class C?

See:

Can I guess? MMDS, ITFS, or WiMax?

--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558            jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
# http://802.11junk.com               jeffl@cruzio.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com               AE6KS
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

I'm

and,

There is an amateur radio band at 2300 MHz

--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
"The RFI-EMI-GUY"©

"Treason doth never prosper: what\'s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."

"Follow The Money"  ;-P
Reply to
RFI-EMI-GUY

I'm

and,

Sure, but it's normally not described as 2.2-2.4 GHz. See the subject line. There are plenty of other services in this frequency area:

Incidentally, note that XM radio at 2332.50-2345.00 MHz and Sirius is at 2320.00-2332.50 MHz Lots of other users crammed in that band including my microwave oven.

--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

Hi Jeff,

Linear.

Thanks, I'll look there.

It's a spread-spectrum digital modulation method we cooked up ourselves that's meant to be highly interference resistant while still being high-speed. It's actually not as complicated as most of those commercial standards -- we're just doing "proof of concept" testing and collecting over-the-air bit-error rate statistics. I can't say that much more about it, but that's due to customer confidentiality and all that -- the techniques used are generally well-known, and we're packaging up a bunch of them together to make something that is a bit innovative.

---Joel

Reply to
Joel Koltner

Jeff Liebermann wrote: (snip)

I think your microwave is misbehaving if it is operating that low!

>
--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
"The RFI-EMI-GUY"©

"Treason doth never prosper: what\'s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."

"Follow The Money"  ;-P
Reply to
RFI-EMI-GUY

Interestingly the only area we're specifically not allowed to emit any signal at all on is 2290-2310MHz -- NASA's deep space network and hams.

Given the type of signals we'll be transmitting (and the margin not being allowed in 2290-2310 implies anyway) I don't expect it'll degrade Sirius or XM, but it will be interesting to see.

---Joel

Reply to
Joel Koltner

There's LOTS of stuff up there - check this out: (careful, it's 93.7 KB, so may take a moment to download)

formatting link

Cheers! Rich

Reply to
Rich Grise

Ok. The one's from Germany I listed will work.

The biggest source of interference is your own transmitter reflected off some object and arriving late to the party, but just in time to clobber the next packet, or fatally trash the incident signal. Also, some nasty nulls due to frequency selective fading.

Pleeeeeze, no Xmax (xG) style claims:

You don't need 10 watts of RF for that. 802.11a/g has a rather high

+7dB peak to average power ratio[1]. Hopefully, your scheme will be better. Also, 10 watt power amps are not all that linear. If you scheme requires minimal envelope distortion and good linearity, you may need to buy a 10 watt amp, just to get 1 watt of linear output. On a good day, figure on about 15% efficiency at 10 watts output, so you need to supply about 67 watts of DC.

If you're testing this outdoors, you're going to trash a large number of existing systems and users. Let me guess... your system belches RF even when there's no data moving on the link? The FCC "licence" is not an open invitation to operate a jammer.

Hmmm... well known with lots of bits per baud? I'll guess Wavelet/Fractal modulation?

Good luck...

[1] OFDM can tolerate about 2dB of compression so the real peak-to-average power ratio is more like +5dB.
--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558            jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
# http://802.11junk.com               jeffl@cruzio.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com               AE6KS
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

Thanks. I have a printed version of that chart hanging on the wall of my palatial office. It's really a nice looking poster. However, both the above URL and my wall chart are dated Oct 2003, which makes them rather out of date. There have also been quite a bit of spectrum juggling going on with various spectrum auctions, spectrum re-farming, WiMax deployments, new allocations (e.g. 3650-3700 for WISP, 1710-1755 relocation), etc. If I want the latest, I go directly to the bureaucracy at: (638KBytes) which is dated Mar 17, 2008. The 2.2-2.4GHz stuff is on pages 34 thru

36.
--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.