Rotary encoders for 65XX and 66XX power supplies

Sep 25, 2008 3 Replies

Hello,



Does anybody know of a suitable replacement for the optical rotary encoders that were used on older Agilent/HP 65XX and 66XX power supplies? These were phased out on the newer generation supplies which use mechanical types. Agilent no longer has any stock, and advises me to replace the entire front panel PCB at a cost of $631.00.



I believe that the encoders are part #0960-0822. I have no documentation on them. Pictures can be seen here:

formatting link
formatting link



Thanks.


'scuse my ignorance but where are rotary encoders used in power supplies ? dialling up voltages ? so can replace with something else only functionally the same ?

-- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on

formatting link

On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:37:28 -0400, JW put finger to keyboard and composed:

I believe that QRPG = Quadrature (?) Rotary Pulse Generator

Your encoder looks similar to the HRPG series.

HRPG Series Miniature Panel Mount Optical Encoders (H=housed?):

formatting link

Pinout:

  1. Ground (dot on bottom) 2. Channel B 3. Vcc (+5V) 4. Channel A 5. Shield (Housing Ground)

FWIW, the following URL states that the "HP optical encoders (HP QRPG-A475) ... are 32 count per revolution, with quadrature output. Actual Part#: HRPG-AS32#14C".

formatting link

Mouser carry this part (HRPG-AS32#59C):

formatting link

Unfortunately the MOQ is 20 units @ $38 each :-(

Here is a Bourns 32PPR optical encoder (US$18, MOQ=1):

formatting link

Datasheet:

formatting link

It may be worth noting that the following HP encoder also has a 5-pin connector, but different pinout. Therefore I wouldn't assume that the HRPG and QRPG pinouts are identical.

HEDM-55xx/560x & HEDS-55xx/56xx Quick Assembly Two and Three Channel Optical Encoders:

formatting link
formatting link

Pinout:

  1. Ground 2. Not connected 3. Channel A 4. Vcc (+5V) 5. Channel B

- Franc Zabkar

Please remove one \'i\' from my address when replying by email.

Thanks for all your help Franc. I think I'll give that one a try.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required