or wrong,
duation:
talk to
it and
but
think.
right
Perhaps. But I didn't get to chose which projects got funded - your criticism is of U.K. engineering management, which wasn't all that good, rather than of my competence as an engineer.
Sure. Whoever said it was? Apart from From LinkedIn, who want to make money out of it ...
I'm going to do stuff for you for free? I may be curious, but I'm not gullible.
"as
That's the one that sticks in my mind - perhaps because Winfield Hill did find it funny. I'm not going to do a web search for additional examples - that would be taking you much too seriously.
I did pretty well from 1969 to 1991. After I'd turned 49 there were actual gaps between jobs - I'd become experienced and relatively expensive. People skills generally improve with age, so you've got to be hypothesising that I metamorphosed into a wolverine in my late forties, which is implausible, even for you. In fact at that point I'd become the social glue that held the Cambrdige Instruments electron beam tester project together, which was unexpected, and used up half a day a week that I'd have preferred to devote to circuit design and debugging.
But you do the selection and hiring, so you are the Highland Electronics personnel department, as well as filling a number of other functions. A jack of all trades, though you seem to have mastered electronics, if not perhaps to the level of becoming a living national treasure.
sYou left out the "take up references" and/or talk to previous employers part of the advertise-resume-inteview procedure. In the last decade of my time in the UK I used to get a few phone calls a year asking about people who had mentioned working with me to prospective employers.
Which is to say you really haven't mastered the advertise/read resume/ interview routine which allows you to access a rather bigger pool of candidates.
So your limited skills in personnel selection aren't actually lethal.