**Nothing YOU can say will suggest that the science is wrong. You are far too stupid to be able to mount a credible argument. You have failed, thus far, to do so. **You're not very bright. You continue to snipe, rather than presenting a rational, reasonable argument. Look at how Mr Liebermann conducts himself. You're nothing like that. You are a failure. **A failure in the sense that you think you are smarter than you really are.
OT: carbon dioxide reduction question
He is an audiophool salesman / module replacement tech? Some education.
?-/
He's also an anti-gun nutball.
rot.
eation.
I forgot about that one. He is into victim disarmament, and with it - discrimination.
The further you dig, the worse it gets.
No need to dig. It's obvious.
Lets use helium instead then we could sound like Mickey Mouse - should be a major hit with the kids.
Also, reading his posts on the CFL thread, he's a religious bigot.
Jerry
Yep, sure can.
Duh, rooly? No need to get bent out of shape.
There must be, if European breweries (who were brewing the stuff long before your lot) produce excess CO2 and have resorted to making carbonated soft drinks (er, that's "pop" to you) among other methods of using the EXCESS.
There are different brewing methods.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required