OT: carbon dioxide reduction question

Oct 01, 2011 68 Replies

**Nothing YOU can say will suggest that the science is wrong. You are far too stupid to be able to mount a credible argument. You have failed, thus far, to do so.
**You're not very bright. You continue to snipe, rather than presenting a rational, reasonable argument. Look at how Mr Liebermann conducts himself. You're nothing like that. You are a failure.
**A failure in the sense that you think you are smarter than you really are.
Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au

He is an audiophool salesman / module replacement tech? Some education.

?-/

He's also an anti-gun nutball.

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.

rot.

e

ation.

I forgot about that one. He is into victim disarmament, and with it - discrimination.

The further you dig, the worse it gets.

No need to dig. It's obvious.

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.

Lets use helium instead then we could sound like Mickey Mouse - should be a major hit with the kids.

Also, reading his posts on the CFL thread, he's a religious bigot.

Jerry

Yep, sure can.

Duh, rooly? No need to get bent out of shape.

There must be, if European breweries (who were brewing the stuff long before your lot) produce excess CO2 and have resorted to making carbonated soft drinks (er, that's "pop" to you) among other methods of using the EXCESS.

There are different brewing methods.

You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required