Do you have a question? Post it now! No Registration Necessary
Subject
- Posted on

Re: Isolated, regulated, toroidal step down transformer AC power supply design.
What a stupendously stupid proposition to make.
The topographic particulars of any individual post has NO IMPACT whatsoever
on the chronology or the EXTERNAL thread structure of any given subject of
conversation on Usenet, AFAIK.
If you have a reader that CAN thread conversations based on the internal
topographic details of the text of individual posts, then good for you, but
you can't expect others to adjust their habits for the peculiar capabilities
of your reader.


Re: Isolated, regulated, toroidal step down transformer AC power supply design.

**Oh yeah? See if you can find anyone who disagrees with Bob. Bob has you
nailed.
I'll wait.
While I do, go to one of the following newsgroups:
rec.audio.tech
sci.electronics.repair
Maybe they'll help you.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
--

Re: Isolated, regulated, toroidal step down transformer AC power supply design.
Oh, OK. So why should I try to deny any allegation of success!
Yup, you got me: This is a successful Troll.
I've fooled you all, *except that wise-old-sage Bob* of course. He saw right
through me from the beginning.
Oh, and Phil of course, although I appear to have him turned around, I know
he'll come good. He should have trusted his instincts and never budged an
inch.
Oh, and you of course. Bob has set you strait.
Yup, you got me so nailed I can't scratch my arse for trying.


Re: Isolated, regulated, toroidal step down transformer AC power supply design.
The plain ordinary sense of what I said and the truth of the matter are both
in my favour.
Internal topography makes no difference to the thread structure of Usenet
topics on most software 'Readers'. If there is such a 'Reader' that can
thread conversations based on the internal topography of individual
messages, I've yet to see it.
Therefore, the topography I choose makes absolutely no difference to the
ORDER in which individual messages are read. However, the ORDER in which
the conversations are presented by the software 'Reader' are not necessarily
chronological.
This was what seemed to be confusing "Swanny", originally. When he retorted
"No it isn't." to my claim that I had already given the explanation he
requested about 1/2 dozen times in the same thread. I had. Possibly all the
explanations (which are still there) appear BELOW this point. IE. 'Reader'
software does not necessarily present statements in chronological order.


Re: Isolated, regulated, toroidal step down transformer AC power supply design.
In this case, as indeed in ALL cases, the topography I chose would have made
ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE to Swanny's dilemma.
ALL my explainations would STILL appear BELOW this point, irrespective of
the internal topography of the individual postings.
Is that clear?
makes absolutely no difference t

Site Timeline
- » Trickie's website ...
- — Next thread in » Electronics Down Under
-
- » Servo control with vb after packaging problems
- — Previous thread in » Electronics Down Under
-
- » Happy Birthday
- — Newest thread in » Electronics Down Under
-
- » Jaycar.
- — Last Updated thread in » Electronics Down Under
-
- » (PDF) Hair and Scalp Diseases by Amy J. McMichael
- — The site's Newest Thread. Posted in » Embedded Programming
-