generating ntsc video

Can anyone give me an idea as to the bare minimum system requirements for generating the picture information for some NTSC video at a very low resolution?

I'll be working with a small 8085 microcontroller for which I don't yet have the exact specifications (it either operates at a 1KHz or 1MHz clock speed), and I was wondering if I could somehow use this to generate a composite video signal, or if the microprocessor is underpowered for such a task. I'd need some auxillary circuitry to generate the video sync (possibly using an LM1881). If anyone here who's done something similar wouldn't mind giving a few pointers to a newcomer, please post any information that you think might be useful to know.

Thanks Jacek Mazurkiewicz

Reply to
Jacek Mazurkiewicz
Loading thread data ...

It's an 8080 with a few added instructions, and usually operates at

2 to 8 Mhz. Minimum 4 clocks per instruction. Last seen in the first Mars lander.
--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
 the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article.  Click on 
 "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the 
 "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
Reply to
CBFalconer

You're not going to be able to generate NTSC because you can't generate a color signal from 1MHz. You will have to make do with monochrome 60Hz video. If you are using the LM1881then you must already have some external video coming in. You'll need to "genlock" the CPU clock to the external video otherwise the jitter is going to be huge. You have approximately 64 microseconds to put the pixels on each line. Your processor at 1MHz can do no more than 16 instructions in that time so the horizontal resolution will be 16 pixels or less. The poor processor won't have time to do anything else but generate video.

In other words, get a faster processor or an external video generator. The lowest end generators that I know are written for the old 16f84 PIC chip. Google for "picdream.zip". Peter

Reply to
Peter

Are you creating a video output or a video output overlayed onto an existing video picture?

If the second does the output still have to produce an output if the input is missing?

What type of very low resolution information - lines, boxes, characters?

What update rate of information?

Is your information monochrome or colour?

Even for NTSC getting the line frequency accurately from either of those frequencies will be difficult.

You would only use the LM1881 if you were decoding the syncs from a video input, it is not a video sync generator.

There are plenty of CPLD free designs for generating NTSC timing patterns.

Look at Altera and other peoples web sites.

Without knowing answers to the questions above and what space and cost budgets you have it is pretty meaningless to give many pointers, other than I would not start from here.

I would start from knowing I could generate the video signals and knowing what I was trying to output in the way of information. Then consider what micro and other peripherals I would need.

Video data rates can get a lot faster than most micros depending on the application.

--
Paul Carpenter          | paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk
    PC Services
              GNU H8 & mailing list info
             For those web sites you hate
Reply to
Paul Carpenter

Google on Lancaster "Cheap Video" Don Lancaster wrote a couple of books called "The Cheap Video Cookbook" and "Son of Cheap Video" covering exactly what you are trying to do, with a similar CPU back in the 70s or maybe early 80s. From what I remember, the 808x family was so wasteful of clock cycles that it was not usable for direct video generation for text display.

As another poster mentioned, the LM1881 is useful for decoding the sync signals from an existing video signal. If you wanted to overlay your video on top of some other signal, it's useful. Otherwise, you could probably come up with some discrete counters or a timer chip that would be more useful.

Bob

Reply to
MetalHead

Anyone remember the Sinclair ZX-80? Good times!

Reply to
Sam O'Nella

Many thanks to everyone who wrote in; your comments were most helpful. I will post again once I get more details regarding the system and it's capabilities; I am doing this for a class, so I'm pretty much locked in to using the particular microcontroller that comes with the system.

I suppose that I needn't overlay my video onto an existing source, so the LM1881 is out of the picture for me. As far as the type of video I'll be looking to generate goes, some boxes or characters that I store in ROM would be just fine; I'm mostly interested in generating the video as a proof of concept.

I'll be checking out the resources you guys mentioned and hopefully will be able to come up with a tractable problem.

Thanks Again

Jacek

Reply to
Jacek Mazurkiewicz

To the best of my knowledge the video was controlled by a Ferranti UCLA (UnCommited Logic Array - FPGA) to drive the timing and shifting out a section of a line's video data. The memory was dual ported with video controller becoming bus master (forcibly..) and grabbing the video data.

The ZX80 did not use the micro to *directly* control timing and data.

As was mentioned in other posts an external controller (CPLD etc..) is one solution to controlling the video and possibly video data.

--
Paul Carpenter          | paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk
    PC Services
              GNU H8 & mailing list info
             For those web sites you hate
Reply to
Paul Carpenter

You'll need to generate the Line and Frame Sync pulses, and add in the Video information, to create a monochrome VBS ( Video,Blanking,Sync)

-commonly IIRC the composite signal is 1V p-p.

One challenge will be to do this, on an 8085, without also getting time jitter from the software. Start by trying to generate the Sync, and a simple large square box in the centre of the screen. That will establish signal levels, and stability.

-jg

Reply to
Jim Granville

See

formatting link
for a good explanation of generating video using an 8052.

See

formatting link
for a cheap, completed solution.

Reply to
Kenneth Lemieux

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.