OT: Harry & Meghan

Well, you of all people would know.

-- This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

I believe Harry's Mum Diana only met Charles a handful of times and the wedding day was the thirteenth time they'd actually met!

I have no info on that claim one way or the other. But it's not germane to the argument anyway. The point is, everything about the Spencer family that might have adversely affected the match was in the public domain well before the wedding took place.

It is a classic distraction from important topics.

As usual, News Thump has sardonic takes on the matter...

and

I was hoping for a good terrorist attack to take the royal wedding out of the news cycle. /s/ Mikek

Demonstrably not. Not even one.

I was rather disappointed it didn't piss down with hail, rain and thunderstorms.

-- This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

God isn't interested either.

Oh, be nice. Royal weddings at least displace All Trump All The Time.

Are there good terrorists?

Or make it the center of the news cycle for some time to come.

It was *you* who suggested it!! ;->