Hi
I am working on a LED driver
Standard LED with average 2mA current. I am drinking it at 10mA, so duty cycle is 20%
Just wondering, is there any lower limit for the eye for minimum duty cycle?
Cheers
Klaus
Hi
I am working on a LED driver
Standard LED with average 2mA current. I am drinking it at 10mA, so duty cycle is 20%
Just wondering, is there any lower limit for the eye for minimum duty cycle?
Cheers
Klaus
That would probably be frequency dependent.
Let's say we use a frequency so the eye cannot detect flicker, 50Hz
And then drive the LED within the specs at 20mA, 10% duty.
The figure of merit of best efficiency point may be non optimal, but I do not consider that right now
Data sheet:
Klaus Kragelund wrote on 8/25/2017 11:30 AM:
If you drive with a fixed 10% duty cycle it will appear 10% as bright. What is your question?
I have used duty cycle to reduce intensity before, but the blink rate was
*much* higher. At 50 Hz you can see the blinking when you move your eyes. I find this effect very disturbing.-- Rick C Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms,
LED driven with drop resistor with the following current and duty cycles:
40mA, 5% = 2mA avg 20mA, 10% = 2mA avg 10mA, 20% = 2mA avg 5mA, 40% = 2mA avgIs that clear enough?
Cheers
Klaus
I worry that at 50Hz flicker would be detectable and annoying at duty cycles under 50%, especially since there is no phosphor to help out between pulses. It would be more noticeable in your peripheral vision and/or when moving your eyes.
Yes, this is clear. What is your question? A lower limit to the duty cycle? I believe tests have shown there is no practical limit. I think you reach the max current through the LED first.
-- Rick C Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms,
IIRC the eye does get less sensitive for very short pulses, but I forget how short is short.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
-- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant
FYI: please use a high frequency, even just for displays. The flicker of a low duty cycle at 50Hz is irritating to many people; at 100Hz, it may be passable, but is immediately obvious as soon as one moves their eyes.
It can be a safety issue. Every time I'm driving at night, I see cars with pulsed tail lights. Every time I scan my surroundings, bip-bip-bip-bip-, there's a line of dots across my vision and in that instant, I don't know where that car is.
My own experience has shown that over 1kHz is quite acceptable: it's hard to even see the pulsing, and when it can be seen, it's more like a dotted line than a series of overlapping frames.
I mean, it's not like it's hard to pulse LEDs at any speed. Unless they're being turned on and off from the CAN bus. *Shudder*. (You can even pulse them at >100kHz, add an inductor, and get higher LED efficiency! w00t!)
As for frequency, duty and current: AFAIK, at frequencies above the persistence of vision, the eye is a perfect integrator. At least up to pulse widths where transient vaporization occurs (TW, fs pulses?). :)
Tim
-- Seven Transistor Labs, LLC Electrical Engineering Consultation and Contract Design
Like Phil H, I'm not sure about the relation between pulse duration, duty cycle and apparent brightness. One thing worth noting though is that there's an SOAR-type limit to how far you can reduce the duty cycle to get the same average current.
To take an extreme example for illustration, you cannot safely run a common 5mm LED (T-1 3/4) at 2A peak at 0.1% duty cycle to get 2mA average even if it has a continuous rating of 20-30mA. The maximum peak current is probably in the region of 100mA. It's best to check the manufacturer's datasheet if you're thinking along those lines.
At least on the CREE web site, there was a white paper about running LEDs in pulsed mode.
Tim Williams wrote on 8/25/2017 1:46 PM:
YES! The first time I saw this I was merging onto a road that can be busy and it appeared there was only a single car as I prepared to merge. On moving my eyes back to forward it suddenly looked like a dozen taillights were beside me and my instinct was to twitch the wheel away. Fortunately I didn't as there was no place to go. That was a Cadillac and since then I have seen this on many cars. I can't believe the auto makers haven't seen that this is a problem and upped the frequency.
-- Rick C Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms,
If you stay below safe pulse power levels for the light output I believe there is no limit in the percentages you are looking at. PWM-dimming (which is duty-cycle dimming) is done down to factors of 0.001 and less.
Assuming you want to keep a reasonably high brightness with fairly harsh multiplex duty cycles: For the LED itself you'll have to request the peak forward current rating from the manufacturer. It is often stated in the datasheet with infra-red LEDs but less so with LEDs for the visible range.
A typical rating would be ten times the continuous max and if you go above the rated pulse limit the lifetime begins to deteriorate. I believe the mechanism of wear is degradation via local electromigration. When you push the current to duty cycle ratio to extremes you could also smoke a bond wire.
-- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Yes, I wrote that in the original post. I wont drive them higher than the 25mA rated current, 60mA peak. Mind you, that is a thermal limit the first one, the second a pulse current limit
Cheers
Klaus
Good info
I will contact the manufacturer for more information, just to be sure
Cheers
Klaus
Given the responses that you are getting here, maybe you should try it.
-- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc trk jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
Can be risky depending on what the product is. For example, it might all work fine on the bench and even for a few weeks. Then in the field LEDs start to dim or fail way too early. We've something similar that at a client where a contract design & assembly house had not protected an RF input well enough. They claimed it was fine and that everything was bench-tested. Problem was, after a number of thunderstorms rolled through more and more transceivers became desensitized to the point where end customers considered them deaf. Ranges went from hundreds of feet to tens of feet. The customers wanted new units on warranty, lots of them, and every one of them required a truck roll to install it.
I've got some more stories like that.
-- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
The graph "Luminous intensity vs Forward Current" in the middle of page
5 on your datasheet goes to 60mA at 10% duty cycle which is encouraging. I guess the dashed part means "only pulsed" but Everlight should be able to put something in writing for you.Mind the temperature derating curve on page 5. For that to start dropping already at 25C is a bit disappointing.
-- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Klaus said he wouldn't exceed the LED max current spec, so it should be safe to play with duty cycles and see how it looks.
-- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc trk jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.