smallest wired keyboard?

Yep. which makes you a liar.

All scientists operate on the basis of theories that cannot be proven to be correct.

But they don't state that those theories are fact.

In fact, they explicitly understand that those theories are simply the most useful thing they have.

Amazingly, you are even more ignorant than you first appeared to be.

Re: Off Topic Spam, Was: smallest wired keyboard? NOT CrossPosted ;-).

Hello All,

Many of you are only talking about other things than the subject tells, or this area was/is designed for.

Please stop these silly crossposted newsgroup messages about Apple (computers), Apple or Android mobile phones, 3.5 TRRS Jacks, FM-radio function, and hex programming old eproms in the previous century 80's, wirewrappingguns, apps on Apple or Android phones etc, as almost all of that has totally nothing to do with Raspberry Pi hard- and/or software.

So those whole (much overquoted and spaced) discussions are total OFF TOPIC here in this RBERRYPI FidoNet EchoMail area and associated UseNet NewsGroup.

Also the Radio Shack shop, basic TTL ic's, 555 timer has totally nothing to do with Raspberry Pi's, so those subjects are also of topic here.

Please use other area's/newsgroups than RBERRYPI for that, but not here anymore. Does not matter how interesting those discussions are or not. But here we should always only talk about the Raspberry Pi Single Board Computers and sort alike.

Besides that, the contents of many messages are completely different of what the subject field says. Most of them are not talking about the smallest USB wired keyboard any more. So please also change te the subject field, when changing the contents.

Rapberry Pi users are not interested in the hate/love relation between some users wo are writing here almost every day, without contents about our beloved litle SBComputer Pi. Content other than Raspberry Pi related is Of Topic here.

You can continue Android and/or in Apple phone questions in respectively: comp.mobile.android, or misc.phone.mobile.iphone, but stop CrossPosting those discussion also into this RBERRYPI area.

Here we only want to read about Raspberry Pi's (not pis), Raspbian 32 and 64 bit Linux, Ubuntu and RISC OS software, program's and tools, or GPIO hard- and software or video camera projects all with Pi's.

And last but not least, do not feed the trolls !

Thank you all in advance.

Henri.

Oh yes they do.

I see you haven't spent time listening to scientists on the media. Especially 'climate scientists'

Amazingly, you are even more ignorant than you first appeared to be.

Nope.

Give an example.

The offtopic flamewar is annoying, yes, but ^this you can easily solve: turn off your Fidonet gateway. Would also solve a few reverse annoyances like every Fuckonet post using the wrong timestamp, many f****ng up the subject line and replies using your own quoting style that no one else uses.

"Professor Brian Cox explores mankind's place in the universe. He looks at how we came to understand that we are not at the centre of the universe."

Brian Cox appears not to understand eaither relativity or Quantum theory.

Name me one supporter of the hypothesis of catastrophic Mann made climate change that says that their hypothesis is anything but fact.

Only the bleeding edge of psychicists understand that a model that explains how things happen and predicts then reliably, is not a fact. It is a model that reliably predicts how things happen.

The rest call it 'scientific fact''

In the case of Mann made climate change it has failed to make a single reliable climate prediction, *ever*.

Amen.

Aren't we at the center in terms of our outwardly expanding light cone?

Who knew that studying conic sections in school would have direct implications for how to mathematically slice Einstein-Minkowski spacetime!

I prefer the mass "informers" to the mass "entertainers"of the proletariat such as Brian Cox is, as are a host of others who cater physics to the hoi polloi, where it takes them (Neil deGrasse Tyson, Arvin Ash, Brian Greene, Neil Turok, Matt O'Dowd, Michio Kaku, et.al) an hour to tell you what Sabine Hossenfelder or Edward Current can explain in just a few minutes.

You can't knock the detailed physics lectures of Walter Lewin, Richard Feynman, et. al, but they're aimed at physics students and not to the general public.

By far, the absolute best, IMHO, people at accurately teaching we commoners are & Nick Lucid & Destin Sandlin.

Don't even get me started on trying to lean anything on Khan Academy. But if I have to pick _one_ who is the best at physics, it's ScienceClic.

There's no way to discuss a political football such as climate change rhetoric is, but just as Apple always happens to give a different excuse for always wanting to do the same thing, the politicians do the same.

Out here, where PG&E fires rage in the mountains, our governor has publicly said he has no patience for intellectuals who don't innately feel purely emotionally so that the PG&E-caused fires are caused, instead, by their desperate need to create an entirely new taxation system.

Sabine Hossenfelder is good (much better than Derek Muller or Henry for example), in getting down to the details, but Alessandro Roussel is the best of the best (of the best!), IMvHO.

The facts don't really matter when there is a political agenda, particularly when _everything_ is blamed on their desperate need to create an entirely new huge global taxation system.

Just like with Apple's arguments about why they constantly remove functionality on the smartphone...

I can reliably predict years in advance that the proponents of the climate change argument will always strive to argue two things in every case:

1. They will promote fear in as many ways as they can, and,
2. The _end result_ will _always_ be they want a new huge taxation system.

Just watch.

Every defense you make for Apple is more evidence you own a very low IQ.

You brazenly fabricate excuses for why Apple does what Apple does. I told you _many_ times that the email/login/password is correct.

If you _L@@K_ at the screenshots I provided, you'll easily see _why_ Apple disabled the account (which I already told you many times what that is).

/Look!/ .... _look again_ at the screenshots .... .... *look at the _obvious_ facts nospam* ....

If you didn't have a low IQ, you'd _easily_ see _instantly_ why Apple disabled the account even when the _correct_ login & password are provided.

Once you figure out why, then you have to ask yourself why Apple cares so much to track every move you make by your IP address, nospam.

Ask yourself why _that_ is the case.

HINT: I have _plenty_ of iOS devices, each of which do the same thing, as I was _testing_ what Apple would do if you didn't allow them to track you.

What I love is when these low-IQ iKooks actually say the truth without even realizing that they inherently know why Apple requires clusterfuck cables.

Apple's sole goal _requiring_ those Lightning clusterfuckcables is exactly the complexity that Lewis inherently realizes is their only reason de etre.

Apple: You can't repair a phone. Customer: Why not?

Apple: Real Policy: Because I won't make any money if you do. Apple: Oh wait. Strike that. Public Policy: Because it's too dangerous. Apple: Yeah. Whew. Too dangerous. You could blow yourself up or something.

Congress: Maybe we will enact Right to Repair laws? Apple: Public Policy: It's too dangerous. *Apple's Favorite Anti-Right-to-Repair Argument Is Bullshit*

Congress: Bullshit. OK, then we will enact Right to Repair laws. Apple: OK. I give up (hehhehheh). You can repair your iPhone now.

Apple: But I'll just _raise_ the prices to f*ck the customer anyway. *Oh Great, Apple's Raised the Repair Costs for the iPhone 12*

Consumer: But it costs _more_ to repair now than ever before! Apple: Heh heh heh... Apple is clever. The Apple customer is who is stupid.

The iKooks can't ever formulate a sensible argument on ANY topic.

Why do you respond to Alan Baker? His IQ (at about 4) is half of yours, where even that is not saying much.

Every time you respond to him (or to "Hank" or "Rod", et. al), then I have to see their crap which is always them trying to prove they're smarter than a brick.

The iKooks can't ever formulate a sensible argument on ANY topic.

It's not me who is confused. You iKooks always fail in the basic "adult logic" compartment. The AAA batteries are about half the size and about the same price as AA.

The iKooks can't ever formulate a sensible argument on ANY topic. For me, it's a better deal to buy devices that take AA instead of AAA.

The iKooks can't ever formulate a sensible argument on ANY topic.

It's unusual to find small consumer devices which can't be designed for AA. If you've never looked, you won't realize how accurate that statement is.

I'm not saying they can't make a smaller AAA device than an AA device.

I'm saying almost everything AAA you'd want to buy exists at about the same size in AA - where then it's a better deal overall to use the AA batteries.

The iKooks can't ever formulate a sensible argument on ANY topic.

My point is that I strategically purchase parts that have the best bang for the buck in terms of batteries, where I shun AAA in favor of AA, just as I shun non-rechargeables in favor of rechargeables, and just like I shun C cells in favor of D cells.

BTW, I used to work on defibrillators, where you'd be shocked at how fantastically HEAVY a GE NiCad C cell truly was in those days.

The difference in weight, in those days, between a GE NiCad C cell and a RadioShack NiCad D cell (which was just a C-cell inside a D-casing) was like the difference in weight between a bowling ball and a feather.

The point being that the capacity is what matters most; not the size.

In summary, when I buy small'ish devices, such as headlamps or small flashlights, I ignore the AAA offerings and only buy the AA offerings.

That has advantages and almost no disadvantages in my practical experience. That you disagree is fine - but you need a sensible argument and yet, you have none to supply.

Why? I don't know why.

I suspect you don't own an adult brain, nospam.

Why oh why did you drop the crosspost to the iphone group ?

I had that filtered!

That term is not clever it is inflammatory and arguably it may be considered "hate speech" - it would be better for all if you were to stop engaging with them, it encourages them and irritates everyone else.

I've said my piece, after all you may be software for all I know.