Who would use this facility ?

Sep 17, 2009 9 Replies

and why? I recently saw some printed advertising copy, including this statement concerning BGA chips "We safely remove the existing lead-free solder balls and replace them with SnPb "



cannot find reference to that on their site, just

formatting link
BGA Reballing (Lead Free / 63-37 / High Melt Ceramic Packages) $1/2 million investment in a unique technology has allowed Retronix to reball BGA and uBGA devices without inducing a thermal cycle (mass reflow), which can damage the integrity of the device. We use a laser energy pulse which attaches the solder spheres individually to the pad in less than



20m/s. The bonding of the sphere to pad in this short time does not allow heat dissipation into the silicon die, therefore offering a safe alternative to mass reflow. The equipment shown is contained within a clean room environment, supplemented by laminar flow hoods and a nitrogen chamber for the reballing process. We can process sphere sizes from 760 microns down to
100 microns.


Why? Maybe you don't like the total lack of reliability of lead free balls, perhaps?

with

That was my thinking. mission-critical useages with RoHs derrogation, defence/aero-space/medical or perhaps others who don't want to tarnish their otherwise good name by knowingly producing defective goods.

Anyone who is concerned about tin whiskers?

with

reflow),

alternative

for

to

I thought one of the advantages of using the BGA format was to avoid closely spaced tin-whisker-liable interconnect pinning/traces.

-- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on

formatting link

Watched a special on the telly the other night where lead free was mentioned. Lead inhibits the growth of whiskers they say. :)

Anyways, seems that a satellite responsible for paging went down due to whiskers a little while back. Supposedly caused quite the ruckus here on Earth. And that some scientists in aerospace are very worried about whiskers. Imagine some nuclear arms or even conventional explosives fitted with lead free electronics and the newer military and civilian aircraft electronics that are lead free.

I'll admit to not being as informed about lead-free as I should be, but I'm pretty sure the U.S. military is packing lead, so to speak. I assumed the same was true for militaries world wide.

It is not just tin-whiskers/tin-pest/poor mechanical strength. I was not aware of this side issue (due to 40 to 50 degree C extra temperature at pcb soldering stage )

formatting link

Cobham is a military concern - drone maker and in-flight fuelling equipt, but I came across their page only 2 weeks ago with otherwise inexplicable mysterious

2 faults with MLCC caps on a definitely non-military mixer-amp

Anyone aware of a www site pulling together all thse aspects? plenty out there on adopting PbF practices but little on knocking it other than piecemeal references

-- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on

formatting link

Ouch!

Maybe they made some stuff for the Airbus pitots that failed on that French 330 that crashed? I noticed not long after they pulled every last one and went with a different vendor.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required