mikroElektronika development boards

Aug 01, 2006 8 Replies

I am thinking of getting a PIC development board and was wondering if anyone has tried the EasyPIC 3 board from mikroElektronika. Their board seems very well specified and not too expensive. Or are there better boards available elsewhere?



I have one, had it a few months, I love it. I've ported a few projects from the EasyPic 3 to more permanent setups without problems.

Things to watch out for: The compilers, C, Pascal and Basic are code limited to 2k unless you buy the program for extra $$$$$. The assembler isn't. Almost all peripheral setup is done with library functions which you have no access to other than using them. RS232_Init, Lcd_INIT, etc.

Within those limits, it's a great board, handles every flash PIC they make, and will generate code for a lot of older PIC's as well. With those I load the hex code into my PicStart 16B and program them. Yes, I've been PIC'n around for a while.

Tom

Thanks for your advice about the board, it does appear to be the best >

I haven't tried crownhill's package. I use more C than anything. MikroElectronica's programs look complicated until you get the board, then it all makes sense.

Just curious, where does the limit occur? The linker shouldn't care if the code was asm or c or Pascal, but the compiler doesn't know how big the library functions are.

3ch

I have both the Crowhill Proton Board and EasyPic 3. The EasyPic 3 is better in the fact it has got everything on one board. Switches, 7-seg, LED's. I/O, Pots etc.

A lot better where as the Proton is smaller with less components and connectors. But it does have the breadboard which is a very good idea.

I would go for the EasyPic 3 especially in the UK as it is on offer at £79 + you can get a compiler (Basic, C or Pascal) for around £59 with it. Or it is £99 with the GLCD, LCD and temp chip.

Ray

Try this link too, different!

formatting link

They're cute, I like the color graphic display module, but you need a MPLAB ICD2 to program them, and they're not cheap.

Yes on further research it needs the ICD2 which I do not mind if I can programme in Basic as oppose to C as per their site suggests. Or try these:

formatting link

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required