You need a logic analiser, loads of cheap ones on ebay. Once you capture a program loop you can load it onto your simulator and step through it, if its function is not obvious. Program the analiser to ignore that loop and repeat untill you have them all. The whole process is suprisingly easy if your source is not too big.
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
R
robb
address
on the
board without
servo
time with
this with
to sight
oops my reply went too early i had not finished so this is just continue of previos.
ok, i believe it. i thought maybe step through the real program in PAUMON with real feedback
*BUT*
my brain lapse/over active imagination/etc I see your point, the paulmonis not going to be doing any translation for me and certainly not clearing a path to all the I/O , i guess my hopes for paulmon (monitor) were too high
run
have the
:( alas another project i am working on
have built
*will* be
which company
well i am trying to do this hobby style so probably will not progress to that point sorry to put a wrench in your potential windfall earnibngs :)
thanks for help and ideas Ian, robb
R
robb
it's
"Paulmon"
and
to
program
run
require you to
will be a great
used. You
to various
parameters for
instructions.This will
instructions in the
letters. i.e
output.
the keys are
discover this....
basic OP codes
Thanks for the help and reply TT_Man,
I've started a bit down the path you suggest already. I printed out data sheets for all the onboard ICs for quick reference to what the inputs and outputs should look like. i started on creating a schematic/circuit diagram for the micro-board for understanding and easy lookup of interconnections.
i have dis-asembled the ROM code with a dis52 from the 8052 web site and i also used another dasmx130 that someone suggested but i get two different dis-assembles ?
one treats the (02096f) in the first 3 bytes as a (long jump to
096F) where the other disassembles the (02096f) into something else like this ...
so that can not be a good sign , and leads to confusion so i suppose i will need to hand dis-asemble aways and confirm which dis-assembler is more accurate.
Looking at some used books on 8051 by MacKenzie and others
Thanks again for advice TT_MAN, robb
R
robb
Thanks Chris for the help and ideas, robb
run
you'll need a
do the
essentially
to do
is a good
cables and
target...
trace
a 2K
system.
E.E., with
analytical mind
Thanks Chris for the help and ideas, robb
R
robb
it's
purpose
the
execution on the
preferably
in-circuit
logic analyzer
American-Arium) called
family, etc.
several 8031
exactly how the
our local
don't know
anymore...
Thanks Dave, lots of good info heer in usenet.
thanks again for info and reply, robb
T
TT_Man
02 09 5F is LJMP to 096F. dump the other disassembler.!
M
Mark Borgerson
I ran into quite a number of problems of that sort in APPLE II assembly code where whatever system generated the code would intersperse defined constants with the generated code. The disassembler would try to disassemble string constants and debugging data (such as function names, etc.) and would then miss the first instruction of the next function.
Sometimes you may have to look at instructions such as LJMP 096F and make sure that the bytes at 096F really are executable code.
It's little things like that which make disassembling and reverse engineering a non-trivial excercise. Which is OK by me as it paid the bills for almost half a year back in the '80s.
Mark Borgerson
C
ClueLess
If you have copied the rom then get an emulator and load the code. Then run step by step to know where it is going.
If you wish you can provide me a munged email id and I will send you the emulator, (freeware) which will show the ram, rom etc and you can see what happens at each step.
ClueLess, but not this time.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.