Re: Analyst: Tests showing Intel smartphones beating ARM were rigged

>
>> >> >> >> So does Intel's Atom-based Clover Trail+ platform really outperform ARM >> processors in smartphone benchmarks? Not so fast, says one analyst. >> >> In June, The Reg reported analyst firm ABI Research's claim that it had >> pitted a Lenovo K900 smartphone based on Intel's Atom Z2580 processor >> against a brace of devices build around ARM system-on-chip (SoC) >> components and found that not only did the Intel part perform better, >> but it also drew less power. >> >> But Jim McGregor of analyst firm Tirias Research smelled something >> fishy, and after investigating, he now says the surprise showing by >> Intel had less to do with the chip itself as it did with inconsistencies >> in the AnTuTu benchmark used to conduct the tests. > > Gee, the tests were rigged. Who would've ever thunked it? Monopolies don't > seem to do nearly as well when they have to compete.

I really don't understand which part Intel does not understand from all this.

They need to make a lower power consumption ARM competing chip and sell it at a lower price for less performance than an ARM chip, and run Linux.

e.g. resurecting a 486 into a modern CPU with 16 gbyte addressing on 20nm process is still equivalent to an arm on steroids if its running at 500MHz and consumes half the power will sweep the market if it is released running Linux and available at say $4.

If a single header file describes the entire CPU and all its registers, then ARM is a DEAD DUCK because they don't know how to write a single file that describes arm registers consistently across arm chips unlike microchip for example.

Which part of all this do these failed MBAs in Intel and their failed marketing department not understand?

Please write clearly below in the space provided:

Your worthless excuse: _______________________________________