Interrupts - Loss of Edge triggered interrupts

Do you have a question? Post it now! No Registration Necessary

Translate This Thread From English to

Threaded View

When interrupt sharing is not required, is Edge triggering is the
right choice over level triggering? I heard that the interrupts can be
**lost** in the edge triggering but in level triggering the chances
are less. But I don't understand how a interrupt can be lost in edge
triggering with no sharing.

Can anybody throw some light on this?


Re: Interrupts - Loss of Edge triggered interrupts
This may depend on the hardware you use, but the interrupt hardware
unusually does not have a FIFO to store multiple interrupts.

When using shared interrupts, multiple hardware interrupt sources are
routed to a single interrupt pin of the CPU or near-CPU interrupt

AFAIK, this is not related to weather the pin the (external) hardware is
connected to is programmed to detect a permanent level change (that
needs do be reset by serving the external hardware by the software) or a
  pulse (that does not need a service to go on doing it's task and
perhaps create another pulse).

So the difference between level triggering and edge triggering is that
with level triggering in fact an interrupt will not be lost undetected,
but instead the hardware will fail to do it's next task if the CPU is
not able to service an interrupt fast enough.

In both cases the CPU failing to service the interrupt fast enough will
result in loosing a hardware event, unless the event itself can be
delayed by the hardware (if level triggering is used and the hardware is
done in the appropriate way).


Site Timeline