Synthesis-place&route performance test.

Nov 14, 2007 2 Replies
P

I would like to find out how well different system setups performs when it comes to Synthesis, Place & Route with Xilinx ISE tools. I would like you to synth/place/route the source package below. And then reply with: cpu type, cpu frequency, ram type, ram size, motherboard vendor/model, operating system (uname -a), total time used.



File:

formatting link



Tested on linux Xilinx ISE 8.1i. If you run any linux compatible system it's just to download and type: bzip2 -dc Minimig1.tar.bz2 | tar -xvpf - cd Minimig1 time make ; uname -a



The makefile might work in win32 enviroment (or use the gui). Even obsolete systems is of interest. To get more data on which factors that makes a performance difference.



Vote
Twitter Facebook LinkedIn
J

CPU: Intel Core2 Duo E6850, 3.00GHz RAM: 4GB DDR2, 800MHz MB: GigaByte GA-P35-DS4 (Intel P35 + ICH9R) OS: Fedora 7, 2.6.23.1-21.fc7, x86_64

$ time make real 3m46.928s user 3m36.843s sys 0m1.245s

Jan

Vote
Twitter Facebook LinkedIn
A

I saw runtime differences up to 1 minute when I implement the design multiple times. Each implementation was run on a freshly unpacked project directory. Maybe this is due to your design not meeting timing.

CPU: Intel Core2 Duo E6600, 2.40GHz RAM: 2GB DDR2, 667MHz MB: ASRock ConRoe 945G-DVI(Intel 945G + ICH7) OS: Ubuntu 7.10, 2.6.22-14-generic, i686

ISE 9.1.03i (design did not meet timing) real 5m33.115s user 5m31.925s sys 0m1.080s

real 4m25.734s user 4m24.641s sys 0m1.004s

Vote
Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required