OK, I've read the xilinx blurb but I still don't understand the difference between 3 and 3E.
If I have enough gates and I/O's for my application, is there any other reason for preferring one over the other - like speed or cost ?
regards, Dave
"Dave" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:TZGdnVxMkOOSR4vYnZ2dnUVZ snipped-for-privacy@giganews.com...
Spartan3E is advertised as FPGA with 25% more logic ressources and 25% less cost than Spartan3. Check your distri or digikey about that.
Some hidden facts:
- Spartan3E has less I/O's than Spartan3, but has additional input only pins. If your application can use these inputs - e.g. for adc's - you have more available user pins than on S3.
- Spartan3E has fewer packaging options, e.g. the XC3S500E is not availlable in a TQ144 package. The S3 XC3S400 has a TQ144 option.
- Spartan3E has muxed configuration pins which can be advantage or disadvantage, depending on design. The spi flash support is a main advantage for system cost savings. Further on parallel memory is supported for configuration.
- Spartan3E has improved multipliers. Check a simple design with a*b (2 72 bit vectors), the logic ressources on Spartan3E are less.
There are other differences, like configuration bit stream length, etc., they should be collected, and put in the FAQ.
MIKE
-- www.oho-elektronik.de OHO-Elektronik Michael Randelzhofer FPGA und CPLD Mini Module Klein aber oho !
Things I like about Spartan-3E V Spartan-3
Config from SPI or Flash. - Cheap and usually only needs one device.
The differential terminator.
Cost is slightly better? - Does depend on project needs which is best.
The magicbox gate to speed up PCI.
What I don't like No DCI
The number of input only pins. Why could these not have been clock pins and left us more general I/O.
There are only 4 banks of I/O that limit combinations when you have a multvoltage I/O system. For example you could have Flash at 3.3V, DDR2 at 1.8V, LVDS at 2.5V in a system. In this kind of system you can't always use the left overs on a bank on one particular voltage. Spartan-3 wins because it has 8 banks and less lossy in this situation.
The general architecture and internal speeds are essentially the same and if it were available I would love a Spartan-3 with a SPI load. Unless I am totally penny pinching then my choice would almost always be Spartan-3.
John Adair Enterpo> OK, I've read the xilinx blurb but I still don't understand the difference
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.