Sharing a single Lookup Table

I am implementing the gamma correction LUT as in
formatting link

if I want to share a single combinatorial lookup table with multiple input, it is not possible, right ?
because in this case, the lookup table would just assign to one output reg
say all r, g and b channels want to use the same combinatorial lookup table, how would I do it ?
Someone suggested the following, could anyone advice ?
mux -> lut -> demux
But my friend told me the following instead:
A 256-sized table can be done in one slice, containing 4-luts--for every output bit. It will consume all 4 luts of the slice.
So ... we're talking about 8 slices, or 32-luts, per color.
96 LUTs is reasonable. Now, if you wished to somehow re-use those 96 LUTs to get your logic down to a smaller size, be prepared for the fact that it will cost logic to make any logic change--perhaps as much as the 96 LUTs that you would originally need.
Reply to
Marvin L
Loading thread data ...
t, it is not possible, right ?
g
le, how would I do it ?
You can share a blockRAM-based lookup table between two users. A LUT-ram-b ased lookup can't be shared unless you timeslice it. Yes, you can do a 256 ->1 lookup in one Virtex-7 slice (using 4 LUTs, 2 F7, and 1 F8 mux).
I looked at your function and it doesn't look like you can use a lookup tab le. There is a 3x3 matrix multiplication so the output is a function of R, G, and B, so if you wanted to do a lookup the table would have to be 3-dim ensional and have 256^3 elements. I think you actually have to implement t he logic in this case. Because the R,G,B inputs are only 8 bits each, you can still implement the multiplications in 256-deep lookup tables, but you' d still need to sum the results together to get the result of the matrix mu lt.
Reply to
Kevin Neilson

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.