Re: ISO9660 compatibility - please help

I have been struggling for over two days now with this.

> My ISO9660 output translation code makes and burns > an ISO9660 CD (no Joliet, nothing - plainest ISO 8.3), > which Windows (XP) won't accept...

So you have a problem with Windows.

And why do you post to comp.os.vms ?

If you tried it on VMS you failed to describe the results, and even then you should not be bothering all the _other_ newsgroups !

Obviously my ISO input (which is many years of age) > does read it as it reads any other CD it has seen. > I found a utility for Windows (isobuster) which had some > objections initially; after some fixing of my > code this thing now just opens the disk and reads > absolutely everything without reporting any errors at all. > I am looking at the header (Windows won't accept the disk at all, > it says the disk file system is damaged) and > I canot see the reason why my disk is rejected... I have > put the starting part of the disk (root directory included) > at
formatting link
, as it appears starting > with LBN 0 at the rewritable CD (written in mode 1, 2048 > bytes per block) I am burning to test the whole mess. > Please, if there is some ISO knowledgeable soul out > there, have a look - I'll appreciate any hint, right now > I have run out of ideas and I am going to sleep...
Reply to
Larry Kilgallen
Loading thread data ...

Obviously because he is not sure where to find someone knowledgeable on the subject. What _you_ should be criticizing is his failure to set follow-ups. We can't do it because we have no idea what group he originally posted in. I think it is fairly topical for c.a.e.

--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Reply to
Chuck F.

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.