Agreed. Even non-corporate forums tend to have more effective policing, etc.
The UID/credential issue can be automated with many browsers. But, you
*do* need to remember to "go look at it". There is no way that "it" can tap you on the shoulder if something significant has transpired (e.g., auto manufacturers mail recall letters to owners instead of expecting those owners to periodically check a corporate web site!)Waiting to get bitten by a problem (and *hoping* you can realize that you ARE encountering a problem) is not the way I like to do things! :> Do you hand-verify all of the computations that your spreadsheet performs? It might be handy to get NOTIFIED by someone who has already stumbled on this instead of retroactively LOOKING for such a report after you
*suspect* a problem ("Oh, yeah... that was reported 3 months ago!")I've seen this also true of independent sites. You're at the mercy of the "entity" controlling the resource. I think it's a reflection of the "corporate maturity/confidence" in how they address public gripes. I.e., a disgruntled customer can gripe in any of several other ways (social media, mouth-to-mouth, blog, etc.). So, running from criticism is a Chicken Little approach, IMO.
Or, the *right* people reading (and responding)! E.g., a low traffic forum/list can be very effective if each question posted receives an ACCURATE reply -- no need for 20 messages if 1 will suffice.
One real issue is forcing folks to search archives and FAQs *before* posting. Answering the same question repeatedly (asked by different people) can jade an otherwise cooperative "forum member". I.e.,
*ding* the querant and reply with "read the FAQ" (etc.). This should serve notice that laziness will get no response and, ultimately, cost them their access to the resource!