Is a purely-analog chip possible without sampling?

Apr 08, 2008 71 Replies

Must be very satisfying for the sad f*ck who started this thread to see his profound achievement...

geoff

sense. In

air

Is that your pathetic way of admitting you are wrong then? (in my opinion there will also be a finite number of angels on the head of a pin, if any :-)

MrT.

I cannot speak for the OP's level of satisfaction. Perhaps you can explain why it is that you feel the OP is responsible for Don Bowey's name calling.

======================================================================== Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don\'t make | two, one and one make one." mrkesti at hotmail dot com | - The Who, Bargain

No. It's my pathetic way of saying it's utterly ridiculous to discuss the original question of a 1940s technolgy in terms of quantum mechanics even if I were to think you were up to it.

Go back to rec.audio.monstercables and pick on someone of your own inclinations.

I'm sure he didn't say that; it is, again, you attempting to put a twist to the thread so you can put your sizable ego and sophomoric psychology to work.

I wonder why you used vulgar language to describe the OP, Green, who did nothing wrong except post where you might see it and ply your hobby. You lose.

I agree that geoff didn't say that explicitly, but he did seem to understand that the reason I said you lost the debate was your name calling but he was more definate concerning the OP finding that name calling satisfying. Get it?

The only twist to this thread that I have attempted is in pointing out how very childish it is bash those who you feel are trolls.

I gave up reacting to ad hominem attacks a very long time ago.

Honestly, sophomoric is plenty sufficient int this case!

Oh? I'm wondering WHEN I used vulgar language to describe the OP!

I don't feel that I have lost but you go on thinking that if it makes you feel better about yourself.

======================================================================== Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don\'t make | two, one and one make one." mrkesti at hotmail dot com | - The Who, Bargain

Some large Polynesian mussel shells supposedly do that. When you hold them to your ear you hear the sounds of the sea.

As a SW manager once put it that way: "All you analog dudes think the real world is analog but since Max Planck it ain't so no more".

Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.

Or the sound of your blood flow being acoustically amplified and reflected back to your ear, at least. Try it with a microphone in an anechoic chamber and let us know how you get on :-)

(and yes, I realise you were being sarcastic, just as I am)

MrT.

I'm sure the ambient noise swamps the sound of your blood by a few orders of magnitude. ;-)

Cheers! Rich

The sound of your heartbeat can seem deafening if you spend much time in a good anechoic chamber. I tried it in ElectroVoice's chamber in Buchannan many years ago.

orders

Similar to GWB being sure Iraq had nuclear weapons capability no doubt :-) You actually believe a sea shell stores sounds? Why only sea sounds then after it has been far removed for years? I think at least Joerg was joking... surely?

Yep, and I can hear my blood pulsing in an isolation booth, doesn't even require a good anechoic chamber. Of course it's the blood flow in your head you hear, not your "heartbeat".

MrT.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required