design help

Feb 24, 2009 356 Replies

The point was whether slow release compromises contact life. The answer is "no." Your personality issues are irrelevant.

As the OP stated they are.

Probably not. TO-220 power fets are cheap, and can dissipate a watt or so intermittently with no problem.

I suggested measurement, I designed the experiment, you did the work. When the timebase was such as to conceal the entire shot, you repeated the measurements. Fine by me; I trust your data.

And just how was I wrong? What I did was question the claim that slow release is bad for contacts. You demonstrated that it probably isn't, certainly no worse than diode clamping.

Because I do electronics, and he doesn't. And because I'm friendly with lots of people, and he insults everybody.

Impossible. He has no "defense", just lame insults.

Amateur.

John

I'm sure they have two Lowe's and three HomeDespots, by now.

The answer is "yes". If arcing is the factor degrading the life of the contact, then slow release will do little to minimize the problem, while fast release with no diode will help.

John "Sugar Ray Weasel" Larkin has become down-right self-destructive.

...Jim Thompson

| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | The first sign of senility is persistently trying to be an asshole The second sign of senility is touting your company\'s wonderful circuit designs as your own, while posting amateur crap on S.E.D The third sign is acting like Polly Prissypants :-)

Peak fet power dissipation will be 360 mW for the equivalent of a few seconds. Not very scary. Even a TO92 can do that.

John

The Austin-Healey overdrive solenoid had a contact that opened when the armature was fully seated, adding some turns and resistance to the winding so it wouldn't fry. Healeys were sometimes known to vibrate.

John

Cool. In some cases, rapid coil current cutoff will be significantly worse for relay contacts.

John

Cool. It's servo'd.

I measured the di/dt of a solenoid whilst the armature was in flight, and extracted acceleration and dynamic inductance from that. I suppose you could deduce something about the pull-in / hold-in ratio, magnetic reluctance of the two cases, forces, yadda yadda yadda, if you had a need. Plug results into fancy model, etc.

Or you could just power the coil and yank on the armature with a scale to see how much force was keeping it pulled in... :-)

Cheers, James Arthur

Vaguely recalling my mechanical engineering electives, can't you calculate all that from inductance versus armature position... Hamilton's principle?

...Jim Thompson

| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | All Hail King Obama, The Resurrected Messiah :-(

For solenoids that bottom hard and go to essentially zero air gap when seated, the holding force per amp is way, way higher than the pull force.

Ac-coil relays automagically reduce their coil current as needed.

John

Beats the heck outta me ... I was going to derive it from basic physics.

But then why model--probably inaccurately (or wrongly)--when you can measure? On the current waveform it was easy to see where the armature started to fly, to watch di/dt slow as the armature entered the solenoid, and flatten out abruptly once the armature slammed home.

The 'scope capture gave a great time-of-flight record too.

Cheers, James Arthur

Yes, I prefer experiments myself. But I also like to understand. I didn't do much with Hamilton's principle in school, but have since used it several times when calculating the power requirements of various solenoids versus core position, AND how fast they'll move.

...Jim Thompson

| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | "The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public\'s money." - Alexis de Tocqueville

Yup! 12V | [100R] COIL | [100R] FET | 0V and, yet, you were ready to plug a TO-220 in there before you were forced to look at the numbers. That\'s just sloppy. JF

Wrong again. You said the fet power dissipation would be a problem, and I responded that a TO220 could be used if it were.

You are really obsessed, hanging on my every word. That's sorta sick.

formatting link

Hell hath no fury...

John

Sorry, but no... What I wrote was: " On top of that is the increased dissipation in the driver, which for a larger relay and a longish time would probably require the extra expense of a heat sink. You must have glossed over the "larger relay" part.

Yeah, you've been that way since I mentioned that I'm married.

John

Yup; I don\'t mess around with married chicks. JF

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required