--- Actually, in this group, the consensus is that there is no such thing as a stupid question.
Your original post was, I believe, handled in that manner.
However, since you didn't like the answer(s) you got, you've chosen to be ever more combative with the passage of time, leading one (me, anyway) to wonder why you're here at all if not just to attract attention and feed your ego.
Why _are_ you here, anyway?
-- JF
I do not think that I must be happy or shut up and get away after the first response. The first response provided at important aspect. But, it completely disregards the aspect I wanted to be clarified. It is normal to ask people to take the OP-requested aspect into consideration and, BTW, explain what I mean by "draw more power to save power" to the first replier.
I'm asking here because I do not see a special group on memory/source synchronous topics. If there is something wrong with this way of acting then why I should try creating another thread (in another place?)?
Thank you for confirming my guess once more.
You're guess is that you shouldn't post to the Unsenet? Yes, you were correct.
When I first saw this thread, I thought it was something to do with STASI interrogation techniques.
;-)
-- "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." (Richard Feynman)
I imagine what these agents of devil told you about STASI :)
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required