Zener diode regulator?

to

It is still hard to understand why a system needs to adapt to such a wide range of battery packs, and why a single battery pack must be used for all of the power requirements. Without a detailed specification of all parameters, we are just playing a shoot-in-the-dark game, and being fed pieces of the puzzle. If this is classified, this is not the place to leak bits and pieces of possibly sensitive information. If not, I would be interested in seeing the full specifications for at least this portion of the design.

I am guessing that there may several sizes of drones with different battery packs, and maybe one or more packs of various sizes for each, based on mission requirements. Also, I am guessing that the battery pack(s) are used to drive one or more electric motors for propulsion, and also for communications, video devices, GPS, guidance control, environmental sensors, data collection equipment, etc. All of these probably have different power and voltage requirements, and would have different priorities of reliability and running time. I think it would be foolish to rely on a single battery pack with such a wide range of voltages for all functions.

The electronics should be easily standardized to use 12 VDC, and it would be prudent to have two such packs with a system to provide a backup in case of failure. The propulsion power should be a separate pack, and I would suggest having one for emergency use, and then one or more main packs which may be sized or connected in parallel as required for the mission.

Of course, all of this assumes that you have control of the entire project. Most likely, if you are working as part of a DOD team, the overall specifications were determined long ago and set in concrete by clueless politicians and bureaucrats, and now you must make your design work within possibly unreasonable constraints.

You may deposit my $10,000 consulting fee for your defense project in my PayPal account :)

Paul E. Schoen

Reply to
Paul E. Schoen
Loading thread data ...

Hi Jim,

There are a lot of switchers out there but I just had a quick look at three major vendors. This is the short list below. Note that the 75/76V parts can be accommodated to 80V with a Q&D by placing a string of ~7 1A diodes on the input. This is just a suggestion though.

LM5010 High Voltage (75v) 1A Step Down Switching Regulator (>1MHz)

LM5007 High Voltage (80V) Step Down Switching Regulator

MAX5035

1A, 76V, High-Efficiency MAXPower 125KHz Step-Down DC-DC Converter

If anybody knows of any better high-frequency/high-voltage 0.5A regulators (not controllers) please let me know.

*Peter*

Jim Drew wrote: > I am not against a switching design. I am against one that weighs 3

Reply to
Peter Jakacki

Nah- it is more likely that the project specifications are generated by clueless student bit heads. And it is no surprise when you see the so-called literature the retards use for education. These people are not engineers and never will be; their orientation is more towards word processing than physics. The electrical system parameters are mere numbers, they are not capable of an association with reality due to several factors relating to ignorance, self-delusion, and arrogance. You might note the perspective of the switching power supply being too big versus a realization that the board size allowance is too small; this is a manifestation of the pitiful degree of narcissism so prevalent among that kind.

Reply to
Fred Bloggs

Too much dissipation using linear circuits. You may take a look at the cheap Black switching regulator at:

formatting link

Jack

Reply to
J. Monolog

That regulator is a piece of crap hysteretic converter variant where the mongoloid uses negative feedback on his thresholds resulting in increased switching loss during those periods where a reasonably designed regulator remains off.

Reply to
Fred Bloggs

Good to know! I was willing to try it one day but... The guy seems to be quite "proud" of his design. Especially the efficiency.

Reply to
J. Monolog

In article , J. Monolog wrote: [....]

.. or you could search back and find the article where I posted the design for one that was worse than the romanblack circuit. Many people didn't believe that I could come up with one that was worse but I proved them wrong.

I won't repost the schematic here for fear of causing some peoples heads exploding.

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net   forging knowledge
Reply to
Ken Smith

I don't have much respect for Roman's circuits (although I saved them away in my computer). I think it's always worth a few more pennies to get more-reliable, dependable, predictable performance. Your design may have been worth looking at. Sadly, I missed it.

--
 Thanks,
    - Win
Reply to
Winfield Hill

In article , Winfield Hill wrote: [...]

I think you are just repressing the memory. Do you have nightmares about one transistor DC-DC converters?

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net   forging knowledge
Reply to
Ken Smith

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.