Why is an EV's backup power less than it's driving power?

Nov 17, 2022 Last reply: 3 years ago 175 Replies

OK, but at least he promised to kill-file me and Google group. If he response to any of my posts, he is lying.

I would love it if I could also killfile him. His posts are never of value. He won't acknowledge anyone else could be right and insists that every misunderstanding of what was said was someone else's fault. Reminds me of that Phil guy. God! What a piece of work he was. I haven't seen much of him in a while.

I've been discussing the OpenEVSE design in another group and I am surprised to realize that the interface spec on J1772 is a bit loose. They define the actual component values and only the no load source voltage. They leave the voltage of the other states undefined other than by the component values. Since the voltage is only read by the EVSE, if it has a shortcoming that changes the voltages of the other states, it doesn't matter as long as its recognition of those voltages is adjusted to suit.

I would have never thought of doing that. It can lower the noise margin, significantly.

Golly. I used to cruise at 115mph all along the autobahns. That being about as fast as my Opel Manta could manage.

130mph I have done rather too often, on quitet bits of camera free roads. I have been driven at 145mph (indicated) in a race tuned Rover 3500...when hitchiking in the 1970s.

Its fine, provided other road users are used to it. You simply dare not do it (even in Germany) in heavyish traffic because people WILL pull out in front of you. Realistically 30mph faster than what you are overtaking is a limit

Degrees are meaningless.

For example, Tony Fauci has a Doctor of Medicine degree. Look at the f****ng mess he made in the last two years.

Please change then to a proper Usenet compliant tool, because you are making hard to follow your posts for those people that happen to be reading at uk.d-i-y or alt.home.repair. It is not about your comfort, but that of other people.

On the other hand, it is true that a fair number of people filter out all posts coming from Google Group posters. You will not know about them, of course.

He was advising Donald Trump, who does seem to have a lot more to do with the the US failure to to cope all that well well the the Covid-19 pandemic.

Faucci didn't get to be be an advisor to the US president on the basis of the work he did to get the Doctor of Medicine degree - it was the work he did after he graduated that made him famous. At his level degrees are pretty much meaningless - you have to get one to get the kind of jobs he did, but the skills you need to satisfy the people running academic medical training aren't really the ones that made him justly famous.

Commander Kinsey may have a degree in physics, but what he posts here suggest that the he has long forgotten everything he learned when he was getting it. He looks exactly like the UK equivalent of Flyguy - an opinionated idiot with delusions of competence.

You can't killfile him because you are using google groups (which is such a shoddy newsreader that it does not provide a killfile).

Installing a proper newsreader and getting off google groups will provide you the ability to killfile him (in this group or across all groups that you read).

formatting link
At least two free Usenet NNTP servers:

formatting link

Hey Bozo, you call me an "opinionated idiot" - well, you are just an IDIOT!

I'm sure that you like to think so, but that's just one more of your idiotic opinions.

And if I'm just an idiot, why would you care what I think of you?

This is how you spend your time...

I really need to get a newsreader and use the kill file filter.

You weren't always like this.

Actually I was. My first ever publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal - the Review of Scientific Instruments in 1972 was a thoroughly snarky comment.

formatting link
I never thought much of it, but many years later Phil Hobbs pointed out that it had been cited in Methods of Experimental Physics in their section on photo-multiplier linearity, which was bizarre, Peter Land's paper on photomultiplier non-linearity did miss a vital point that an earlier - and much better - paper by Lush had got right, but all they needed to do was cite Lush and not Land. Sadly Lush had published in the UK Journal of Instruments, and Americans didn't read that.

No, it is PROVEN by your IDIOTIC positions on things such as your claim that you can install a LEVEL THREE Super Charger in a residence.

No, it is PROVEN by your IDIOTIC positions on things such as your claim that you can install a LEVEL THREE Super Charger in a residence.

Except that I didn't say anything of the sort. I just said "fast charger". It takes an idiot like you to imagine there's only one kind of fast charger and insist that I meant "a LEVEL THREE Super Charger".

As "proofs" go, this is merely excellent evidence your own idiocy, as if we needed any more of that

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required