Vaporizing dust during chip manufacturing ?

Are matter anti-matter annihilations being observed in uni labs on a regular basis?

Common sense is the rule of the day.

A puff of wind provides all the action reaction energy we need to move a dust particle through sea level atmosphere. Why burn more than needed?

And obviously you are another "idea man" even more stooopid than I am!

Come on, you moron! He's an "idea man"! Why does he care "WHY" dust is a problem. He's just giving your stooopid ass the answer to SOLVE the problem!

Idiot.

Yes ... and in (big) hospitals too. Google "PET scan".

George

Unfortunately that Wikipedia value of 17.975e16 J/kg is wrong.

In SI units, a joule = newton*meter = (kg*m/s^2)*m = kg*m^2/s^2 = kg*(m/s)^2

E = MC^2 ~= 1.0 kg *(3e8 m/s)^2 = 9e16 J

Eric

Ah... molecular level stuff. Only about one ten millionth of what one would need to take care of a dust particle.

Still quite implausible.

AlwaysWrong is *ALWAYS* wrong. How _do_ you do it? Mass is mass (didn't we just have that discussion, Dimmie?).

Nope. It gets converted from mass to energy. E=MC^2, ya' (don't) know.

Irrelevant. It ended up 46ish grams short.

More irrelevance (your middle name).

AlwaysWrong, *HOW* can you be so wrong? Always!

Just like Skyduck's ignorant trolling.

So 46 micrograms == 1 ton of TNT.

So converting dust to energy might be a little hard on silicon wafers.

John

It was stupid of you for even considering it.

Just like your 'figure it out in your head in less than a minute' crap you claimed you and your associates used to do, you should be able to make this determination within ten seconds.

You failed. Nothing unusual there.

Still do. Just did (an SPI ADC/FPGA timing situation), just a minute ago.

Less, of course. That wasn't the point.

I enjoy playing with numbers, because I like numbers. You hate and fear numbers. Get over it and you'll be better off.

John

You're the one that got it wrong, multiple times.

They were deluded into thinking that they could 'hit' the particle with some undetermined amount of 'anti-matter'.

" It is easier to place most of the manufactuing process in a vacuum and eliminate the dust particles. {Hint: dust cannot float in a vacuum to land on the wafers, but drops like a rock to the floor.} "

According to my physics class in high school a perfect vacuum cannot be created and there will always be some air left over...

Concerning issue's with damage to chips by vaporization:

1. First create a vacuum.

1. Then convert any floating(?)/remaining dust particles to energy.

2. Then place wafers inside it and start vacuuming.

Alternatively plan:

Slowly turn dust into energy to prevent nuclear explosion ;) :)

Another crazy idea would be to use water and produce the chip in water...

Somehow purifieing water and maybe water better than air ? But I doubt it ;)

I just had another idea:

1. First create a vacuum as good as possible.

1. Then highly charge the surroundings of the vacuum with static electricity.

Hopefully this will attract all remaining floating dust particles.

1. Perhaps keep it like that... and start producing the chip.

1. Otherwise if the static charge is to be disabled, first vaporize the dust particles on the side or wipe them off ?!?

Bye, Skybuck.

Google semiconductor clean room

Serious people work on this.

John

And if people would just quit answering him, I wouldn't see anything from him at all...

None that would keep a dust particle lofted though you ZERO common sense dumbfucktard!

Sure, dumbfuck. There are folks in all the clean rooms around the world wandering around with rags, wiping things free of their accumulated dust.

Jeez, dude. Do the world a favor. Spend the next week locating a gun, and then release the world from your utter stupidity by using it on yourself.