The CDC says vaccine protection is tumbling for older Americans, though they still work very well for younger people

Sep 10, 2021 Last reply: 2 years ago 25 Replies

This doesn't happen to be true, but Brent Locher keeps on repeating it as if he can't understand any of the comments that point out that the fatuous nclaim " your vaccine will not work if I do not take my vaccine" is one that he seems to have invented all by himself.

Sounds perfectly sensible. Some people (not many) can't be protected by vaccination, and we do need to protect them against potentially infectious idiots who should have got vaccinated but refuse it because they are deluded idiots.

There's nothing remotely fascist about putting pressure on people to get vaccinated. The US Supreme Court endorsed compulsory vaccination against smallpox back in 1913, back before fascism had been invented - though there was quite a lot of fascist thinking around then.

<snip>

It is extremely similar to several other coronaviruses, SARS, MERS and historically the coronavirus we now call OC43 from the 1899 pandemic. Compared to the Black death or Ebola it isn't so bad at 1% fatality rate. Things get really serious when the disease causes >30% fatalities.

You can never say never unless someone was careless and left a GM marker gene in the final construct but it looks far more like a natural virus that has jumped species naturally to all but the most paranoid.

Delta is about where a designer virus might have *aimed* to start out. The original Covid-19 looks much more like something that has changed hosts and then adjusted to maximise its infectivity in that new host.

Bats have a very funny immune system that allows them to coexist with a lot of viruses in their system without getting sick. They are a perfect reservoir for this sort of potential crossover infection.

There is an advantage to society if everyone behaves sensibly but in the US the right to do really stupid things is absolute.

Yes. At least in the UK with about 80% of people now vaccinated the infection is still pretty equally split between the small unvaccinated

20% (mostly young people and dyed in the wool refuseniks) and the 80% who are vaccinated. Deaths split 40% to 60% in the same cohorts. However, we are seeing far too many younger unvaccinated people die. They often lament their poor choice of refusing it on their death bed.

formatting link
The age factor and relatively poor immune response of the most elderly to the vaccine accounts for the higher proportion of vaccinated people dying. Many more of them would die without the vaccine (and may yet die if their double jab vaccine efficacy wanes too far during this winter).

formatting link

It is still infecting a hell of a lot of people daily in the UK where Delta is the dominant strain. Being vaccinated gives you a slight edge of about 3x more exposure before being infected but the most important thing it does is a 20x decrease in the risk of hospitalisation or death.

NB a single dose of a two dose vaccine schema gives almost no useful protection against Delta according to the BMA. It worked pretty well against all the earlier strains from 10 days after the first jab.

Yes. It would work if we had a proper truly sterilising vaccine but the real world data from Israel and UK shows clearly that without other additional measures the vaccine on its own cannot bring the infection levels down. It merely limits the harm that Covid can inflict on us.

Scotland is ahead of the rest of England (their schools have been back for 3 weeks now and 1 in 45 Scots had active Covid infections last week.

formatting link
At that burn rate most people will have had a real Covid infection as well as their vaccination before the next year is out.

They have similar vaccination levels to the rest of the UK. What has changed is that their schools and shortly universities are back on campus. I fully expect the UK Covid rate curve to track last years shape but starting from a baseline 30x higher (so eroding the roughly 30-60x protective factor against serious illness that the vaccine provides).

England is at about 1 in 75 at present. These are high numbers! It will really take off again in October just like last year. Freshers week parties will drive infections in the young and then spill out into cities.

Professional opinions vary on that.

It would be interesting to locate the natural precursor.

And the Wuhan institute had people crawling through caves all over Asia and sending virus samples (including the ones in themselves) back to home base for experimenting. That was known to be hazardous.

Hey SL0WMAN, that decision took us down a rabbit hole that shows how dangerous such mandates can be, even to a brain-dead libtard such as yourself

formatting link
In a far darker chapter, the Jacobson decision also provided judicial cover for a Virginia law that authorized the involuntary sterilization of “feeble-minded” individuals in state mental institutions. In the 1920s, eugenics enjoyed wide support in scientific and medical circles, and the Supreme Court justices were not immune.

In the infamous 1927 case Buck v. Bell, the Supreme Court accepted the questionable “facts” presented in the lower court cases that a young Virginia woman named Carrie Bell hailed from a long line of “mental defectives” whose offspring were a burden on public welfare.

“The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes (Jacobson v Massachusetts, 197 US 11). Three generations of imbeciles are enough,” wrote Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in a chilling opinion.

The Buck decision opened the floodgates and by 1930, a total of 24 states had passed involuntary sterilization laws and around 60,000 women were ultimately sterilized under these statutes.

“Buck v. Bell is the most extreme and barbaric example of the Supreme Court justifying a law in the name of public health,” says Sanders.

Don't be silly; that 'if they had...' question is unanswerable, so is a perfect example of a lame excuse. And, incarceration (forced habitation within a crowded building) is at least as stupid as most cases of vaccine aversion.

There IS NO TEST for degree-of-immunity. There IS NO TEST for 'prior covid infection' that has much significance; immune response can result from virus fragments that aren't infective. So, it makes no sense to hang any important decisions on those factors; it's like assuming luck, or karma, will protect against a plague. You can't test for tomorrow's luck, nor for karmic status, either.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required