I read in sci.electronics.design that Pooh Bear wrote (in ) about 'Sub resist load for speaker?', on Thu, 6 Oct 2005:
Depends what you mean by 'top notch'. 'Top cost', yes; the conspicuous consumption bug is alive and well in professional audio as well as in the audiophool sector.
103 dB/1 W/ 1 m and at least a 500 W amplifier.
Yes.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
If everything has been designed, a god designed evolution by natural selection.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
Speaker efficiency remains the same for SM boxes, determined only by driver efficiency. Changes in bandwidth may appear to make changes in efficiency. Horn enclosures can obviously change speaker efficiency and SPL. For all these explanations, do a GOOGLE groups search, driver efficiency pierce box size
I read in sci.electronics.design that Pooh Bear wrote (in ) about 'Sub resist load for speaker?', on Thu, 6 Oct 2005:
Ah, yes. Eminence short-coil designs. Did you look at the third-harmonic? Actually, what is more instructive is to apply a sine wave, put a sound-level meter in front (set to 'linear' or 'C-weighting', and securely anchored down, of course!) and look at the waveform from the 'recorder output' if it has one.
A 10 inch is far too directional for a midrange. Unless you turn it off above about 1.5 kHz.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
If everything has been designed, a god designed evolution by natural selection.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
You're clearly not familar with typical SR practice.
12" units are often used for mid range very satisfactorily - not to mention the idiotic use of 15" units with a 1" compression driver crossed over @ 3-4kHz.
Bear in mind that some directionality is beneficial for SR use.
** What ever that is - it certainly does not apply to any electrostatic speakers, ribbon speakers, flat panel speakers mid range domes or dome tweeters.
Funny how they all have pretty much the same acoustic conversion ratio of
85 to 92 dB SPL per watt / metre with no boxes in sight.
I read in sci.electronics.design that Pooh Bear wrote (in ) about 'Sub resist load for speaker?', on Thu, 6 Oct 2005:
I'm quite familiar with SR practice AND its defects.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
If everything has been designed, a god designed evolution by natural selection.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
I read in sci.electronics.design that Pooh Bear wrote (in ) about 'Sub resist load for speaker?', on Thu, 6 Oct 2005:
Incredible!
Which planet are you on? There are requirements for loudspeakers with every conceivable directional response, and some that aren't conceivable as well.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
If everything has been designed, a god designed evolution by natural selection.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
This part of the thread was discussing loudspeakers with high conversion efficiency ( as used in SR gear ). Wide dispersion isn't a requirement *in this application*.
Home ( or studio ) audio is another matter entirely.
All depends. Typically, 180 degrees is needed for many events. You can do it with one speaker, or you can do it with many. One of my most common gripes is not hearing the music or whatever, over most of the area. If you go to a 6 inch or 8 inch max. There are drivers with at least 95 dB sensitivity. Those two drivers in parallel will boost that to 101 dB. Two more in series parallel configuration will produce 104 dB. Feeding those with 100 watts will produce
121 dB.
90% of the time, bands setup without the proper dispersion for the entire audience.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.