Solderless protoboard electrical limits

I have tried to contact 3M and one other company that make the white plastic solderless breadboards for electrical information, but they have nothing. Has anyone in this group seen any data that characterizes them for noise and frequency response?

The circuits I want to work with have a lot of variants, are all below 2 MHz, but noise may be an issue. This is just to sort out some ideas, not to do critical testing, so there is some flexibility here.

Another alternative would be prototype cards that components can be soldered to. This will require more time to breadboard, and may be more noisy because they are typically

2-Signal plain, 0-Power plain construction. I hate to take the time do do my own card design/build until I have sorted the circuits and all of their variants out a little.

Any ideas?

Thanks, Dave

Reply to
Dave Boland
Loading thread data ...

2MHz is certainly within their 'digital' bandwidth. Capitance would be a factor at higher frequencies.

For analog noise I don't know. You could put a ground plane under the whole thing, but it would be quite a bit further away than the other side of a PCB. Probably not good in the presence of strong RF from nearby sources either - you could perhaps get rectification in oxidized spring-clip to lead connections, and can probably couple in more noise in the interconnects than you would get with point to point coax or PCB stripline.

Traditional prototype construction for small signal RF circuits is "dead bug" - put ICs, transistors, etc upside down over unetched copper, wire most connections in the air, with anything that goes to ground soldered to the board. You can also add extra high value resistors as standoffs. Not so much fun today with TSSOP IC's, but you can build little stonehenge replicas with chip resistors and caps...

Reply to
cs_posting

Quite a bit closer, actually -- the bottoms of those spring clips are just an adhesive label away from the bottom of the board. I have one that I use for prototyping oscillators up to 10MHz or so that's on standoffs. Note that at 10MHz the only piece of information that I consider valid is that it'll actually oscillate once I get it onto a dead-bug style board.

When I use those I am careful to keep the wires tight against the board surface -- no big loop! It makes a significant difference.

Yup. I just prototype with through-hole components. If I got serious with RF stuff I'd prototype with quick-turn boards. Usually even a bad guess at a circuit is a pretty good starting point for a cuts & jumps fix.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Posting from Google?  See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/
Reply to
Tim Wescott

With careful layout you can do narrowband (i.e. radio) stuff up to

2-5MHz -- I prototype oscillators up to 10MHz, but I'm mostly looking for gain margins and "will it oscillate with these components" before I move the thing to dead-bug or soldered breadboard. I don't think I'd trust it for a _broadband_ signal beyond 500kHz or so, and even there I'd take my results with a grain of salt.

I think that you could push these up pretty high with careful layout, and consideration for what you want to learn. If, for instance, you don't know if a circuit is going to work at all but you're confident that you can deal with EMI considerations if it does you can breadboard it, test it for the stuff that a breadboard won't screw up, then either scrap it or put it on a PC.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Posting from Google?  See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/
Reply to
Tim Wescott

Well, fundamentally the limited frequency response is a property of the capacitance between protoboard conductors. 10-20-30pF is the ballpark depending on geometry.

And "noise", that is not a product that they put into the breadboard. Any noise you see on a protoboard can be attributed to lack of a ground plane, long Vcc and ground lines, big loops in the wiring that pick up external noise, etc. Those are all properties of the construction details (although of course you've chosen to do it on a protoboard so you can't get good short lines.)

Long wires etc. also limit frequency response by introducing inductance.

"Dead bug" construction is surprisingly quick and effective.

Tim.

Reply to
Tim Shoppa

In the digital domain protoboards are useful up to the 10-20MHz region without a lot of effort. Although it takes some thought. At the same time it's trivial to come up with examples that will not work at 1MHz if you put awful long wires on grounds and Vcc's etc.

If you scope out the ground pin on a TTL IC at just 20MHz on a protoboard you can see horrendous bounce! CMOS or HC isn't so bad (but it's still plainly visible on a scope). "Flyover" jumpers turn a nice square 8MHz clock into a ugly wiggly blob after just a few inches, and attempting to clock more than a few chips at once will probably be a disaster. But overall you'd have similar problems on a similarly laid-out PC board (strangely enough you will have the same problem on some of those pre-etched protoboards!)

Tim.

Reply to
Tim Shoppa

*Shrug* I'm listening to a breadboarded discrete audio amplifier right now that does sinewaves out to 300kHz. Probably a lot more if I upped the bias and switched in faster output transistors.

Layout helps a lot, though. First time I assembled the circuit, the driver transistor(s) oscillated around 100MHz. You can't even see that on a slow scope!

Tim

-- Deep Fryer: a very philosophical monk. Website:

formatting link

Reply to
Tim Williams

The contact in the breadboard, yes. But the components would be a lot further away. I guess maybe that's more of a comparison to a ground (+power) plane as a low inductance supply issue than a ground plane as an RF shield.

Reply to
cs_posting

Personally i have found that digital gets flaky around 10MHz and analog can get flaky at 200kHz and is always flaky by 2MHz.

--
JosephKK
Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.  
--Schiller
Reply to
Joseph2k

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.