I bet you think this is about features that are largely software which can be enabled by a simple software upgrade... at a fee of course. Or maybe you think this is about software enable to hardware features that cost very little to add but can bring additional revenue and so become "features" enabled by software upgrades... again at a fee.
Both of these make sense to me. Obviously there is very little cost to shipping software with a unit which can be enabled in the field. Even if there is *some* cost to include the hardware for a given feature, as long as that is minimal then they are earning extra profit by providing you those features and letting you reap the benefit (while the real benefit to you is a lower overall cost of the unit because of simpler logistics). A good example to this is the optional bandwidth upgrades available on some scopes. The hardware is there, it just needs to be turned on in software. The added cost is minimal, in essence the maker is taking less profit for the lower end units.
But what if the cost of the feature is a significant part of the total product cost. Does it make sense to ship all units with that feature and only enable it for a fee? That has got to be reflected in the price for the lower end units. It can't all be paid for by the users of the feature... unless most users buy it.
So what am I talking about?
***************** Today we?re excited to introduce the all-wheel drive Model X 60D. ... the Model X 60D delivers 200 miles estimated range, a top speed of 130 mph and zero-to-60 acceleration in 6.0 seconds.... The Model X 60D can later be upgraded through a software update to
75 kWh to increase range by about 20%. *****************So they sell the car with all the batteries it will ever have, but disable 17% of them unless you pay for the extended range option! Not only do you have to pay for these batteries, you have to pay to lug them around!
Then there is the emergency issue. My cell phone will let me dial 911 even if I haven't paid the bill. It would not be hard to imagine a situation where you need that extra 20% range to get somewhere, possibly in an emergency. Is there a way to get to it? It's there in the car, but inaccessible.
I see this is not the first time Tesla has done this and they claim it lowers their costs. I'm surprised actually. I would have thought saving 17% of the cost of the battery would be significant.
This really bugs me.