Smps Inductor Loss Reduction

----Data---- Circuit: continuous mode smps Inductor current: 1.5amps average with 400mA of peak to peak ripple. Current ripple waveform: triangle at 100khz Rdc: 0.3ohms Wire d: 0.6mm L: 2.6mH

I'm not entirely sure about the following: Does the proximity effect and skin effect only occur as a result from the 400mApp ripple current through the inductor?

The 1.5A average current through the inductor doesn't affect the AC resistance.. If so...It looks like I can ignore these effects due to I^2Rdc loss dominating.

Therefore, I'm free to fatten up the inductor windings until I get close to the AC winding resistance.. How is this commonly balanced? Is it 50 50? (The inductor AC resistance and the DC resistance.) D from BC

Reply to
D from BC
Loading thread data ...

Usually I spec a core that has enough worst case saturation reserves and then select a wire gauge that crams it pretty full but not to an extent that it makes production difficult.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
Reply to
Joerg

Let's say it's a toroid... When you mean full..do you mean multilayer windings for a big fat donut? Or full single layer? D from BC

Reply to
D from BC

For switchers in the few hundred kHz class it's often the big fat donut, for RF filters it's single layer with an isolation layer on the core. Many times switchers will also contain a single layer winding but that is because there comes a point when increasing the wire diameter doesn't buy you much anymore, other than a hard time soldering it in.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
Reply to
Joerg

Cool...Thanks.. I'll go multilayer on the toroid. To reduce Rdc, can I dodge ordering fatter magnet wire by doubling up thinner wire (#23) in some way? Maybe wind a twisted pair on the toroid? Ill effects? D from BC

Reply to
D from BC

I have doubled up wire without problems on switchers. But not for series production as that increases cost.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
Reply to
Joerg

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.