You'll want the top resistor to be a chain of smaller ones, or at most, one large power resistor. I'm guessing SMTs would be easier and cheaper though.
All those intermediate pads/traces/bodies will have parasitic capacitance. Shunt that with several pF per resistor. The ratio Cshunt / Cstray determines how much improvement in flatness you get (against slight peaks and dips at middle frequencies, what Tektronix called 'hook', I belive?). For 1/x times better flatness, you need a ratio of, at most, x.
Needless to say, cut out ground plane and surrounding copper, on all layers, around the divider resistors. The characteristic impedance needs to be high. Of course, you won't get it into the megs, but your cap divider will have some impedance at HF. Keep that in mind where the probe part connects to the pulse part: if it has to be a very stable characteristic impedance (say 50 ohms, out into the 100s of MHz), you'll have to account for the probe capacitance too.
The divider then has to have a pretty large capacitor at the bottom, because of the large ratio. Maybe the total probe capacitance is 1pF, so you need
500pF at the bottom. That's a sucky varicap. So don't bother at all. Let the AC gain be what it's going to be, then buffer it, and put a trimpot there. You still need compensation, but it's easier done at DC instead. So instead of a fixed bottom-of-divider R, use a trimpot. Cal process: adjust Rbottom until flat (no leading edge over/undershoot), adjust output gain until AC/DC gain is right.
Tim
--
Seven Transistor Labs
Electrical Engineering Consultation
Website: http://seventransistorlabs.com
"John Larkin" wrote in message
news:ouuc4b9o1l2d82samn5v58an6kcdiuc2ut@4ax.com...
>
>
> I'm designing a high-voltage pulser, 1200 volts or so, and I'd like to
> pick off a divided signal for the customer to monitor.
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/53724080/Circuits/Resistors/Pickoff.JPG
>
> Rise/fall times will be a few us maybe.
>
> I'd like to have the pulse response be pretty good, so the
> capacitances matter. The OPA171 opamp and R2 have capacitance, roughly
> 4 pF total, and I guess the 1G 2010 resistor will, too. These have to
> be balanced at 500:1 to match the resistors. The cap across R2 can be
> chosen to work, but I don't want a discrete cap across R1.
>
> Maybe the 1G resistor has enough self-capacitance that I can pick the
> lower cap to work. Or maybe I should add some PCB traces to add
> capacitance across R1. I need about 0.02 pF if, say, I pad the bottom
> up to 10 pF.
>
> This will be a 4-layer board with L2 ground plane, but I can cut out
> some plane if that would help.
>
> Has anyone done something like this?
>
>
> --
>
> John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
> picosecond timing precision measurement
>
> jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
> http://www.highlandtechnology.com
>