Russia Beats U.S. at Their Own Game

You're the idiot who claimed Boeing developed communications satellite technology when all they did was acquire the business. They'll make it fail in time.

Reply to
bloggs.fredbloggs.fred
Loading thread data ...

On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 09:02:43 -0700 (PDT), snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com Gave us:

I never claimed that they 'developed' anything. I said they have been making satellites for decades.

Usenet line length is 72 characters, idiot.

And you know f*ck all nothing about quoting in Usenet either. Good job, dumbfuck.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

They've only been in the satellite business since 2000 and you call that "decades"- you're idiot here.

I'm sure you'll show me how, seeing as how you never link to anything, all you do is pontificate, blowhard.

Reply to
bloggs.fredbloggs.fred

nage," Crowdstrike co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch said."

?

coercive power of the state behind them, at least not over here. The feds do.

McCarthy, Richard Milhous Nixon, Ronald Reagan - you can get some thorough ly nasty coercion going on. Not perhaps as nasty as Joe Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot put into action, but distinctly unsavoury for all that.

By any measure, Obama's far worse than Nixon. Obama's far, far beyond anything Nixon did.

Cheers, James Arthur

Reply to
dagmargoodboat

ionage," Crowdstrike co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch said."

o ?

e coercive power of the state behind them, at least not over here. The fe ds do.

oe McCarthy, Richard Milhous Nixon, Ronald Reagan - you can get some thorou ghly nasty coercion going on. Not perhaps as nasty as Joe Stalin, Mao and P ol Pot put into action, but distinctly unsavoury for all that.

That's going two far.

Reply to
bloggs.fredbloggs.fred

Nixon was to be impeached for a cover-up of spying on one opponent, and 18 missing minutes.

Obama's spying on the whole country, targeting opponents en masse, and destroying evidence across federal agencies. And that's barely getting started.

Just telling us "If you like your plan, you can keep it" to get Obamacare passed was more than enough grounds all by itself.

Or cracking open the border, or lying about the flood numbers. Or dereliction--flying to a Vegas fund-raiser while our guys were getting killed instead of doing his job.

If the government were working, he'd already have been removed.

Cheers, James Arthur

Reply to
dagmargoodboat

:
d

That is such unbelievable hysteria, you're sounding like a psych-ward resid ent. Obama is not that complicated. He's probably the most level-headed pre sident since Eisenhower. All you're talking about is business as usual in W ashington. Are you sure you don't want to accuse him of facilitating the ch eating scandal by the AF missile launch riffraff too?

Reply to
bloggs.fredbloggs.fred

te:

:

ond

ident. Obama is not that complicated. He's probably the most level-headed p resident since Eisenhower. All you're talking about is business as usual in Washington. Are you sure you don't want to accuse him of facilitating the cheating scandal by the AF missile launch riffraff too?

Sadly, he's not sounding like a psych-ward resident, but rather like a clon e of Karl Rove, spreading vaguely plausible lies - not plausible enough to convince anybody with working critical faculties, but plausible enough for anybody brain-damaged enough to vote for a Tea Party candidate.

I like the idea of James Arthur as a Swift Boat person ... the sheer effron tery that allowed a draft-dodger like Dubbya to win against a decorated war hero like Kerry has to be recognised as an intellectual tour de force, des picable though it was.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

rote:

te:

eyond

esident. Obama is not that complicated. He's probably the most level-headed president since Eisenhower. All you're talking about is business as usual in Washington. Are you sure you don't want to accuse him of facilitating th e cheating scandal by the AF missile launch riffraff too?

one of Karl Rove, spreading vaguely plausible lies - not plausible enough t o convince anybody with working critical faculties, but plausible enough fo r anybody brain-damaged enough to vote for a Tea Party candidate.

ontery that allowed a draft-dodger like Dubbya to win against a decorated w ar hero like Kerry has to be recognised as an intellectual tour de force, d espicable though it was.

And he has his nerve talking about vacations:

"President George W. Bush. During his two terms, Bush took 879 vacation day s, which included 77 total trips to his Crawford, Tex., ranch. Nine of thos e trips were taken in his first year as president.

While Bush holds the record for the longest modern presidential vacation fo r his five-week recess in 2005 in Crawford, the all-time record holder is J ohn Adams who took eight months off in 1799."

So that's almost 2-1/2 years out of his 8 in office that the mentally damag ed imbecile was vacationing.

Reply to
bloggs.fredbloggs.fred

te:

:

ond

ident. Obama is not that complicated. He's probably the most level-headed p resident since Eisenhower. All you're talking about is business as usual in Washington. Are you sure you don't want to accuse him of facilitating the cheating scandal by the AF missile launch riffraff too?

Are you sure you're not feeling a bit hysterical, Fred?

I listed a bunch of facts. Of course a President should be removed for lying to get a law passed--Presidents are supposed to be men of honor, not liars.

Hey, look, 292,000 undocumented Democrat voters imported since April alone:

formatting link

That's Obama too.

Here's Obama harboring (feting) 10 fugitives in the White House as "Champio ns of Change"--

formatting link
te-house/

The King made them 'legal' by his "DACA" decree (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, aka the "Dream Act")(that the Senate refused to allow).

The President's sworn to enforce the laws, but doesn't. Of course that's grounds for removal, obviously. Don't be silly.

Cheers, James Arthur

Reply to
dagmargoodboat

rote:

te:

eyond

esident. Obama is not that complicated. He's probably the most level-headed president since Eisenhower. All you're talking about is business as usual in Washington. Are you sure you don't want to accuse him of facilitating th e cheating scandal by the AF missile launch riffraff too?

one of Karl Rove, spreading vaguely plausible lies - not plausible enough t o convince anybody with working critical faculties, but plausible enough fo r anybody brain-damaged enough to vote for a Tea Party candidate.

ontery that allowed a draft-dodger like Dubbya to win against a decorated w ar hero like Kerry has to be recognised as an intellectual tour de force, d espicable though it was.

Oh, you mean Kerry the super-rich "pay more taxes" guy who parked his yacht in Rhode Island to avoid Massachusetts taxes? And caught, recanted?

Speaking implausible lies, Kerry shot to fame testifying to a bunch of Vietnam atrocities in Congress, not one of which turned out to be true.

formatting link

Nice hero.

Cheers, James Arthur

Reply to
dagmargoodboat

Nixon could only have dreamed about what Obama has actually done.

Reply to
krw

e:

:

rote:

beyond anything Nixon did.

and 18 missing minutes.

Nobody bother nailing him for the rest.

and destroying evidence across federal agencies. And that's barely getting started.

The Karl Rove machine isn't inhibited by petty concerns with evidence and p lausibility.

amacare passed was more than enough grounds all by itself.

Ask any Tea Party nutter ...

dereliction--flying to a Vegas fund-raiser while our guys were getting kill ed instead of doing his job.

Sounds like a US politician - if he didn't have those kinds of personality defects, he couldn't have been elected.

resident. Obama is not that complicated. He's probably the most level-head ed president since Eisenhower. All you're talking about is business as usua l in Washington. Are you sure you don't want to accuse him of facilitating the cheating scandal by the AF missile launch riffraff too?

clone of Karl Rove, spreading vaguely plausible lies - not plausible enough to convince anybody with working critical faculties, but plausible enough for anybody brain-damaged enough to vote for a Tea Party candidate.

frontery that allowed a draft-dodger like Dubbya to win against a decorated war hero like Kerry has to be recognised as an intellectual tour de force, despicable though it was.

ht in Rhode Island to avoid Massachusetts taxes? And caught, recanted?

That would be the one - he is a US politician, after all.

etnam atrocities in Congress, not one of which turned out to be true.

His name doesn't seem to come up as someone testifying about direct knowled ge. There certainly were US atrocities in Vietnam, and some of them were we ll-documented enough to lead to prosecutions. You seem to think that his re cognising that there could have been US atrocities amounts to dishonest att ention-getting. The url you posted doesn't seem all that willing to recogni se that US forces in Vietnam did behave badly from time to time, and didn't always get caught when they did.

His antics as a Vietnam protester won't have appealed to you. Others might detect a certain heroic content.

Perhaps more heroism than Dubbya displayed when flying in the Texas Air Nat ional Guard ...

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

pionage," Crowdstrike co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch said."

do ?

he coercive power of the state behind them, at least not over here. The f eds do.

Joe McCarthy, Richard Milhous Nixon, Ronald Reagan - you can get some thoro ughly nasty coercion going on. Not perhaps as nasty as Joe Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot put into action, but distinctly unsavoury for all that.

anything Nixon did.

By any measure that James Arthur can fit inside his head. Obama's guilty of being a Democrat, while Nixon was a Republican so his wrong actions were a ll directed towards the far-right goals.

I doubt that Nixon would have dreamed of the Affordable Care Act - which Ja mes Arthur and krw do both see as a crime.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

pionage," Crowdstrike co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch said."

do ?

he coercive power of the state behind them, at least not over here. The f eds do.

Joe McCarthy, Richard Milhous Nixon, Ronald Reagan - you can get some thoro ughly nasty coercion going on. Not perhaps as nasty as Joe Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot put into action, but distinctly unsavoury for all that.

Yep. Articles of Impeachment asserted against Tricky Dick read like Obama's official daily schedule.

formatting link

Cheers, James Arthur

Reply to
dagmargoodboat

espionage," Crowdstrike co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch said."

t do ?

the coercive power of the state behind them, at least not over here. The feds do.

- Joe McCarthy, Richard Milhous Nixon, Ronald Reagan - you can get some tho roughly nasty coercion going on. Not perhaps as nasty as Joe Stalin, Mao an d Pol Pot put into action, but distinctly unsavoury for all that.

Of course, James Arthur doesn't have access to Obama's official daily sched ule, so it's a comparison between what a Republican president was suspected of doing - by Congress, who had evidence to support their suspicions - and what James Arthur suspects a Democratic president of doing, on the basis o f rather thinner evidence, and rather more lunatic presuppositions.

It's a waste of bandwidth. At the moment the official scoreboard has two se ts of Republican presidential aides convicted of crimes - Nixon's Watergate plumbers and Reagan's Oliver North - and no Democrats.

James Arthur is incapable of drawing the obvious conclusion from this resul t - Republicans incompetent crooks, Democrats not yet shown to be crooks - and has decided that since Democrats are - axiomatically - more crooked tha n Republicans, it's evidence that Democrats are better at evading detection .

This isn't a useful way of thinking, but it's what he's stuck with.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

...nothing of interest to anyone.

Reply to
krw

If your definition of "anyone" is restricted to those certified to process only right-wing concepts. Not that krw can manage much in the way of processing of those few concepts which he is willing to recognise.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

Well certainly not of electronic design interest.

Dan

Reply to
dcaster

formatting link

If you checked facts, we'd agree a lot more often.

Cheers, James Arthur

Reply to
dagmargoodboat

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.