Replacement diff bus xcvr?

Mar 08, 2007 2 Replies

First reply

Franc Zabkar

This is TI's page: This is TI's search page: Searching for parts containing "LS1176" at TI's web site finds only the SN65ALS1176. See TI's documentation: The LBC devices appear to be upgrades to their respective ALS versions. They specify lower power and improved ESD. The 65…

Read the full reply
J

The part that has failed has these markings:



LS1176 8AT D5HT



This is the data sheet for it, I think:



SN65ALS1176:


although how to I tell if the failed one is a 65 or 76 prefix part?



Searching local suppliers, I find this:



SN75LBC176A:


Is the second a suitable replacement for the first?



Package is SOIC.



They're both TI, so why the different numbering (1176 vs 176)? What does



65/75 prefix indicate? And regarding the other markings on the failed IC: does HT mean Hi-Temp?

A few too many discrepancies in my mind to just swap it in just yet.



Thanks,


John English
Vote
Twitter Facebook LinkedIn
J

That should read "...is a 65 or 75 prefix part?".

John English
Vote
Twitter Facebook LinkedIn
F

On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:24:06 GMT, John E. put finger to keyboard and composed:

This is TI's page:

formatting link

This is TI's search page:

formatting link

Searching for parts containing "LS1176" at TI's web site finds only the SN65ALS1176.

See TI's documentation:

formatting link

The LBC devices appear to be upgrades to their respective ALS versions. They specify lower power and improved ESD.

The 65 versions appear to have a wider operating temp range (-40C to

125C, -40C to 85C) than the 75 versions (0 to 70C).

The datasheets are here:

formatting link
formatting link
(same as previous)
formatting link

All devices have an SN75176 "footprint".

- Franc Zabkar

Please remove one \'i\' from my address when replying by email.
Vote
Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required