Verification you say? In what way does that differ from him being able to sit back and do nothing until someone verifies that he is interfering and tells him what he is interfering with?.
Leaving aside the vast difference between electromagnetic interference and on-air obscenity, do you imagine that Howard Stern would have been fined just on a single complain without anyone being willing to tell him what he said that they found objectionable? "Yes, Mr. Stern; someone complained about you. No, we won't tell you what you did wrong, or when you did it. No, you will not get a chance to claim that you never said it. No, you will not get a chance to claim that you said it but that it was not obscene. One complaint, no proof, and you get fined with no opportunity to defend yourself." Stern's lawyers would have had the FCC for lunch if they tried pulling a stunt like that. This is still (mostly) a nation of laws and you are still (unless they call you an enemy combatant) innocent until proven guilty.
Perhaps you should stop for a moment, listen to what people are telling you, and consider the possibility that you might be wrong.