Reason why DC mag field disturbs communications on a train

If he is emitting huge standing (or oscillating) magnetic fields he may well be found culpable, regardless of ANY investigating he may or may not have done.

Just call the EPS and mention that there may be an asbestos issue. Let them look into it.

So, your gear is messing with a drain pipe, or a system to open and close the pipe?

I consider dopes that go after a properly framed post to be about as ditzy as Usenet can provide. Ar my opinions about who is and is not an asshole any different than yours? YES. I actually post correctly, and though I do not always snip away all but the sentence I respond to, I could have just as easily interspersed my response, which shoots your retarded line counting, dial-up era baby bullshit all to hell.

Oh, and I find behavior like that a HUGE character flaw, flaw boy. I have seen you do it for years from here to sci.physics and beyond. Quite pathetic, really.

Pretty stupid that you think you need to dictate to me what my post should have contained.

You're an idiot, Macon. Did I spell that right? Go back to the physics group, where you are equally unloved.

Use some common sense. What employee in their right mind would complain about their manager's spelling?

He doesn't have to >

I agree if by "off the mark on his responsibility" you mean "it is not his responsibility"... *They* have to show that they are being affected. *They* have to show that he is the cause. Then and only then does he have any responsibility to even bother replying. BTW, your PC is interfering with something in my lab here in California. Stop it.

Mr.Eko wrote:

Without someone showing that he is doing so? Without someone showing that they are being harmed? Without someone showing that he is violating a regulation and telling him what that regulation is?

No.

"Ar?" Are you a pirate?

(I believe that there should be a comma after "retarded" and hyphens after "line" and "up.")

Showing that you have the knowledge and ability to quote correctly increases, not decreases, your responsibility to do so.

Resorting to personal attacks does not strengthen your arguments. Rather the opposite, as a matter of fact.

--------------------------------------------------------

Posting hints

Here are some references for those who are interested in improving the quality of their posts to newsgroups:

How do I quote correctly in Usenet?

Quoting Style in Newsgroup Postings

How do I quote correctly in Usenet? - Quoting and Answering

The Word Made Flesh

Why bottom-posting is better than top-posting

Quoting and Answering

How To Followup A Post On Netnews Properly

Common Mistakes in Usenet Postings and How to Avoid Them

How should I react to crackpot messages?

How should I react to abusive postings or email?

How To Ask Questions The Smart Way

The power of negative thinking: how to excel without doing anything

Netiquette: "When thou enter a city, abide by its customs."

Zen and the art of the Internet (Usenet section)

top-posters will inherit the earth

Why you shouldn't ask for E-mail responses on Usenet

Why "Reply by email, I don't read this newsgroup" gets flamed:

Put an end to Outlook Express's messy quotes with this automated fix!

From the Jargon File:

For the Engineer/Programmer: News related RFCs and Drafts

From (spit!) Microsoft:

"When including text from a previous message in the thread, trim it down to include only text pertinent to your response. Your response should appear below the quoted information."

Absolutely not. ALL they have to do is make one call to the FCC, and any interference his gear is causing will be seen as a violation on their part.

There is no need to announce interference for it to be illicit. Perhaps you should re-read sub-part 15.

'MUST NOT INTERFERE' has no stipulations.

Bullshit, and oh, by the way... bullshit.

Wrong. The product maker, or system activator is the sole responsible party for ANY interference they MAY make, and NO, there is NO requisite that any person or persons or systems being interfered with announce such interference.

F*ck off, dumbass.

F*ck off, Usenet retard. You are good for nothing more than pissing and moaning about a posting outline. You are quite pathetic. You are almost as bad as the other twit, Jeff whatever.

Resorting to personal attacks does not strengthen your arguments. Rather the opposite, as a matter of fact.

[___] :0 :0]

I would hate to work across the street from whatever is being radiated! Sounds like it was missing the target a lot!

I worked at a place where the words "Pubic Safety" went through the spell checker (and global document delete and replace) and out to a police department. It is embarrassing to see what goes out in corporate communications these days. Folks should speak up!

Yes, apparently the mag field is propagating along the pipe. I can read almost as equal strength as I would standing beside the wall also, I notice there is a little but not much of our 100Khz oscillator signal modulating on this. Today, we decreased the strength of the mag wall to a minimum operating condition to where external influences are just starting to show effects but not enough to cause a process control issue. It's a major pain to align this system.

The pipe will be removed.

Announcing your filter file edit sessions is even more retarded than your previous responses were.

Since he is at least an order of magnitude more retarded than you are, I doubt he can handle it.