>
>(snip)
>
>>>> So much for the electronic misnamed "good old days".
>
>
>
>D>
>>> In what manner were they NOT the good old days? Because you didn't like the
>>> tubes? I think they were were the good old days, and I was there.
>
>Then Allen wrote:
>
>> Well, for starters, I wouldn't want to have a four-story building
>> housing a computer that cost perhaps $40,000,000,000 and also paying a
>> utility bill in the tens of thousands every month to keep it running and
>> cool, just to do what my 3-year-old Dell will do. Nor do I want to go
>> back to LPs and 78s for music. Nor do I want to go back to film as my
>> only choice for photography. Nor do I want everyone who has gall bladder
>> surgery to have a foot-long scar like mine. Nor do I want every child in
>> the country to be at risk of having polio (of which I had a mild case
>> when I was seven years old. Nor do I want to see segregated schools,
>> water fountains, restrooms, etc. If you want to go back to the "good old
>> days", please leave me here, in spite of the bad things happening now.
>> Allen
>
>Oh! You poor (deleted).
>
>What has all that BS to do with your saying:
>
> "So much for the electronic misnamed "good old days".
>
>You're a dishonest person.
Didn't his first sentence answer your question?