Nothing new about this at all.
Nothing new about this at all.
Four Americans died in the Benghazi attack. The destruction of order in Libya, with help from Obama and Hillary, has hurt millions and destabilised both Africa and Europe.
Brexit is just one minor consequence.
Hilarious, huh?
For psychopaths I guess it must be. Incidentally, our friend Bill Sloman, who initially denied the clip existed, has since robustly defended Hillary's repulsive remarks, which I think tells us all we need to know about the man's character. I'm not aware of anyone else who supports Hillary's joyous celebration of this dark deed - and clearly none of the
*normal* people in the comments section below the clip do.
I wonder if he actually *believes* this crap? Honestly, you could put Dubya in there instead and the speech wouldn't be a single word different.
-- This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
te:
y.
ey? I
once
io,
rather than noticing the kind of "peace" Russia is delivering in Syria.
ch better job than Trump at containing their imperial ambitions, which is w hy they spent so much time and effort promoting him on American social medi a when he was running against her.
west - one of Lenin's "useful idiots". Trump is another - though his idiocy is a higher form of mental incompetence, where he concentrates on his perc eived short term interest, rather than seeing his job in any kind of wider context.
Benghazi.
Right wing lunatics like Cursitor Doom seem to think that Hillary Clinton d eliberately went after Gadaffi - in reality Nicolas Sarkozy
was the enthusiast there, and dragooned his NATO partners - the US included - into restraining Gadaffi's brutal efforts to suppress the rebellion agai nst him in Libya.
in
The person directly responsible for the destruction of order in Libya was G addafi. The population rebelled against him, not against Clinton or Obama.
The proposition that either Clinton 0r Obama managed to initiate the Arab S pring is equally absurd.
The famous U-tube video that John Larkin has managed to dig up shows a sup remely uncomfortable Hillary Clinton fielding an unexpected question about Gaddafi's very recent death. She had to improvise, and wasn't happy with wh at she managed to come up with. Anybody who can see hilarity there has to b e nuts.
That's a grimace, not a laugh.
That makes John Larkin one and Cursitor Doom another
Cite?
I've never suggested that Hillary's on-the-spot improvisation was as good response. Her subsequent grimace (not a laugh) suggests that she wasn't happy with it either.
Cursitor Doom and John Larkin seem to forget that Gaddafi was responsible for the Lockerbie disaster, which killed a number of Americans (including one graduate student from the Cambridge academic circles in which we moved at the time).
A grimace isn't a laugh. There was absolutely nothing joyous in Clinton's response - and only people with a very poor grasp of social responses could imagine that they could see anything of the sort.
This seems unlikely. Hillary Clinton was articulate, George W Bush rather less so.
Cursitor Doom's grasp of reality seems to be fading before our eyes.
Cursitor Doom wrote in news:qoismg$mh6$ snipped-for-privacy@dont-email.me:
OK asswipe. Explain how it was non-factual.
Pretty much you, and everything that comes out of your mouth, and everything that flows into this group from your filthy fingertips, is what qualifies as crap.
Yes.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required