Re: Progess on marking spam.

I've now got back to the 24th October 2023, marking all the spam on the way. That involved marking some stuff that I'm pretty sure that I'd marked on previous passes, so it may need to be repeated more than once.

The flood did seems to start the 24th October, and there were quite a lot of call girls, fake drivers licenses, fake term papers, psychodelics and pharmaceuticals in the mix - it wasn't all on=line gambling.

Reply to
Bill Sloman
Loading thread data ...

If you're using two compromised addresses, you'll get double the flak.

RL

Reply to
legg

I guess it's time to say goodbye then, Bill. I'm not sure exactly when GG is ending, but I'll miss you posting your contemptuous nonsense here. However, there are alternatives available at very modest cost. I know you're just a poor pensioner and don't have much cash to spare, but even so, a sub to Giganews (to take just one example) doesn't cost a fortune. I think I can speak on behalf of *everyone* here when I say we'll miss you with the passing of GG if you don't find another route to Usenet.

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

Indeed. Well, I can't think of anyone better than your good self to deliver it, Bill.

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

I don't have any aliases, Bill (unlike yourself).

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

Whatever. The fact is I only have one identity on Usenet where as you have at least two on this group alone.

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

Unfortunately it seems to only hide those marked as spam from your account, they are still visible to everyone else. I too have been marking those slot spammers as spam since they first appeared and it has only benefited me.

Reply to
piglet

There are many, too many, John Larkins in the world.

He wanted me to hire him, and I didn't.

Reply to
john larkin

Unmoderated forums attract foul people which frequently drives the good people away. The fact that he's a sad useless old git is arugably a reason for sympathy, but he's still a jerk.

Some of the posters here have nothing to say except lame insults. What a life!

Electronics IS hard.

Reply to
john larkin
<snip>

So, what I'm hearing you say is, you're upset because he tried to "check your references".

Did you not think that would happen?

Want to blame someone? Blame JT for being public about it.

You on the other hand are attempting to do just what you claim JL did wrong?

Attempting to degrade someone publicly.

Just my 2cents worth. Feel free to blame me for something, if it makes you feel better.

Reply to
jim whitby

It probably will.

Reply to
john larkin

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.