Jim Thomps>> >>
>>> Robert Latest wrote:
>>>> Joerg wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That's IMHO not safer than a copied and pasted signature. AFAIR even the
>>>>> Foxit Software allows you to edit watermarks. It does then tag the
>>>>> modified file with a new red watermark but I bet there is or is soon
>>>>> going to be software out there that wouldn't do that.
>>>>>
>>>> The solution is public-key cryptography, the reverse of which is
>>>> signing. Two of its many names are "gpg" and "pgp".
>>>>
>>> Industry ain't warmed up to that yet, and may never do.
>>
>> So be negative... it becomes you ;-)
>>
>
>I am not negative, never was :-)
>
>But there are certain things industry just won't adopt, for whatever
>reason. I don't see a problem with that though.
In general, management won't adopt what it cannot understand.