formatting link
No.
The examiner\'s not to blame, the turning of the USPTO into a profit
center is.
JF
Radio Receiver w/o local oscillator
Mar 26, 2009
27 Replies
formatting link
No AGC, ghastly biasing.
John
formatting link
The examiner is still supposed to apply the rules. It may not be his fault if he's been employed to do a job that he's incapable of, but he should still be fired.
Sylvia.
.
Doesn't it work as advertised?
Can a crystal radio be set up to monitor the entire aircraft band?
formatting link
What you don\'t seem to understand is that the rule is, except for what
seem to be some rare cases,: "Open the floodgates!"
Such being the case, if the examiner is too judicious or argues too much
against the issuance of the patent, _that\'s_ how he\'s likely to lose his
job.
JF
I once answered an examiner questioning my patent application with, "You're too stupid to understand" ;-)
He granted the patent.
(The circuit DOES work by the way.)
...Jim Thompson
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine Sometimes I even put it in the food
You aren't the only one to use that strategy successfully.
formatting link
He may indeed argue until he's blue, but it takes his time every time he does. in the end, he's measured by income (i.e. patents granted), not office actions. You tend to get what you measure.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required