Hi,
Here's a story on how commercial quantum crypto gear was shown to not actually work according to the principles it was designed to work to, otherwise it would be impossible to exploit the gear!
cheers, Jamie
Hi,
Here's a story on how commercial quantum crypto gear was shown to not actually work according to the principles it was designed to work to, otherwise it would be impossible to exploit the gear!
cheers, Jamie
Then, it was not really a true quantum based number generator.
A true quantum system cannot be "observed" as it breaks the message packet and the key.
They should get sued for making false claims, if that is what they did.
So, you didn't read the article, right AlwaysWrong? Of course not.
Quantum Cryptrography always struck me as "too good to be true". And so it is.
?-(
It was never clear to me why I shouldn't be able to direct the single photon into a laser medium an amplify it.
Rene
IMO they cheated:
"The researchers... intercepted single photons traveling over a 290- meter fiber link network and then re-emitted the corresponding pulses of light.
"The re-emitted pulses in effect blinded the photodiodes used by the trusted party receiving the transmission of photons. As a result, the photodiodes were no longer sensitive to single photons, making them behave like classical detectors that generate a current proportional to the intensity of the incoming light."
Rather like opening a locked door by popping out the hinge pins.
Mark L. Fergerson
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.